The Separation between State and Religion

In time we will realize that Democracy is the entitlement of individuals to every right that was in its times alloted to kings. The right to speak and decide, to be treated with decency, to serve and be served by people in a State of “love” that is, to serve with one’s work for the development of ‘life’. To belong to the Kingdom of Human Beings without racial, national, social or academic separations. To love and be loved. To die at the service of the whole and be honored in one’s death, for one’s life and work was legitimately valued. To be graceful and grateful. To have the pride and the humility of being One with the Universe, One with every realm of Existence, One with every living and deceased soul. To treat with dignity and be treated with dignity for One is dignified together with All others and Life itself. To walk the path of compassion, not in the sorrow of guilt but in the pride of being. To take responsability for one’s mistakes and sufferings and stand up again and again like a hero and a heroine and face the struggle that is put at one’s feet and in one’s hands. Millions of people, millions and millions of people might take many generations to realize the consciousness of our humaneness but there is no other dignified path for the human being.

The “work” as I conceive it is psychological and political. Psychology is the connection between the different dimensions within one’s self and Politics is the actualization of that consciousness in our practical lives. Religion is the ceremony that binds the connectedness between the individual and the Universe. The separation between religion, politics and science, the arts and sports is, in the sphere of the social, the reflection of the schizophrenia within the individual and the masses. The dialogue between individuality and the "human" belongs to consciousness. The tendency to develop cults resides in the shortcomings we’are finding in life as it is structured today. “Life” has become the private property of a few priviledged who cannot profit from it because as soon as it is appropriated it stops to be “life” or “life-giving”.

We are all the victims of our own invention and each one is called upon to find solutions. The only problem is believing our selves incapable of finding them. We are now free to use all Systems of knowledge objectively, sharing them without imposing our will on each other. To become objective about our lives means to understand that the institutions that govern its experience are critically important. That we are one with the governments, one with the religious activities that mark its pace, that the arena’s in which we move our bodies and the laboratories in which we explore our possibilities are ALL part and parcel of our own personal responsibility. That WE ARE ONE WITH EACH OTHER AND EVERYTHING AROUND US and acknowledge for ourselves a bond of love in conscious responsibility. That we human beings know ourselves part of each other and are willing and able to act on our behalf for the benefit of each and every individual. That we no longer allow governments, industries, universities or any other institution to run along unchecked by the objective principles of humaneness. That we do not allow gurus to abuse their power or governors to steal the taxes and use them to their personal advantage in detriment of the whole. That we do not allow abuse from anyone anywhere because life is too beautiful to do so and that we are willing to stop the rampant crime with the necessary compassion Conscious knowledge is every individual's right. Conscious action is every individual's duty.

Blog Archive

Monday 17 May 2010

Part 5- Ton's similarities to Robert Burton- Pause and reconstruction


Part 5
Ton continues, here is the whole post so that we don’t lose our selves in the little quotes:

69. ton - April 8, 2010
elena,
i think we’re definitely not “on the same platform” — but that’s ok. no need to be sarcastic, clarity is an ongoing lifelong process, we both know that, and no need for disingenuousness, if you truly meant what you said, and were to “carefully meditate on it” then there would be no reason for me to elaborate (a hint: when you “carefully meditate” too quickly, you miss the point). regarding “isms” — do your “homework,” another ongoing lifelong process — i offered a few indications of where i’ve looked for a “bigger picture” (here are a couple more… thomas berry, wendell berry), but as far as that goes (“the bigger picture” that is), the possibilities are endless and it depends entirely on you. you see elena, we have this wonderful informational resource literally at our fingertips but what do we do with it? like most things that are used it can also be ab-used, unfortunately there are too many examples, but one that comes to mind in this connection is:
http://thefellowshipoffriends.wikispaces.com/message/list/home there are many others… think about it, or don’t, but consider this; IF you think you already “know it all” and you’re unwilling to consider other perspectives, THEN you’re not going to be interested in what’s potentially available, and of course we all have our little personal agenda to attend to… but you know all this already… right? speaking generally, one aim of “self-examination” is to “get over yourself” and this should at least free you up and point you in the direction of a “bigger picture.” i hope this helps… otherwise, i gladly leave the soapbox to you.



 regarding “isms” — do your “homework,”

NOTE: This is very interesting here and Elena, may I say, is such an innocent idiot. He’s playing around with her like a cat and a mouse without her realizing it. So first he claims that all isms are doctrines of some kind not to be followed and when he’s asked to give an answer from his own self, he won’t because Elena needs to read all the doctrines from the authors he is presenting to do her “homework”

Note from Elena Ton: you’re a sick bully. 


another ongoing lifelong process

NOTE from Elena: and look at that gem: “another ongoing lifelong process” this guy really didn’t miss a day in the Fellowship or any of Robert’s notes. He’s actually very good at it, too bad I can’t congratulate you Ton.

NOTE: This truly is quite amazing because it begins to prove how “infected” people who have been in cults actually become and how they continue to reproduce the same patterns, behaviors and ideologies that they submitted themselves to for so long. THAT is one of the reasons that I find this analysis so necessary. We’ve got to get right down to the roots of this sickness.

So to the point: what we are seeing in this post is that Ton begins to use similar ideas to those used by Robert Burton:
1. another ongoing lifelong process
2. clarity is an ongoing lifelong process

What he’s obviously implying here is that Elena would need a lifelong process to be where he would “approve” her. By now, the discussion has obviously turned into a sickening game between “Ton the all knowing” and “Elena, the ignorant idiot who cannot perceive it herself and needs a lifelong work on herself to make it” and he continues:

— i offered a few indications of where i’ve looked for a “bigger picture” (here are a couple more… thomas berry, wendell berry), but as far as that goes (“the bigger picture” that is), the possibilities are endless and it depends entirely on you. you see elena, we have this wonderful informational resource literally at our fingertips but what do we do with it? like most things that are used it can also be ab-used, unfortunately there are too many examples, but one that comes to mind in this connection is:

NOTE: Is it not amazing? Just like Robert Burton he places out all his “conscious beings” that would need to be read for Elena to have a conversation with him without his belittling her and just like Robert Burton he beautifully rounds it all up by saying

“It depends entirely on you”

WOW! These are real gems. Those reading this one day must realize that beyond Ton and I and our mutual difficulties what is crystallized here is a set of mechanisms that were used systematically in the Fellowship of Friends Cult and that are again being used by Ton against Elena. Elena represents an individual with a voice of her own and Ton is trying to put her down no matter the cost. Elena has a voice of her own to a certain extent but is naïve and vulnerable enough to keep looking for the possibility of participation in the group. She unconsciously submits to the manipulation with the same hope that she had when she joined a cult: that she would be able to participate.

Ton continues:
http://thefellowshipoffriends.wikispaces.com/message/list/home there are many others… think about it, or don’t, but consider this; IF you think you already “know it all” and you’re unwilling to consider other perspectives, THEN you’re not going to be interested in what’s potentially available, and of course we all have our little personal agenda to attend to… but you know all this already… right? speaking generally, one aim of “self-examination” is to “get over yourself” and this should at least free you up and point you in the direction of a “bigger picture.” i hope this helps… otherwise, i gladly leave the soapbox to you.


NOTE: so what Ton is pointing out here is that Elena already thinks that she knows it all. He plays around with her stating she’s unwilling to consider other perspectives and that the outcome is already fixed. The end is magisterial:

i hope this helps… otherwise, i gladly leave the soapbox to you.

He robes his self with the helping hand and subsequently attacks her for the soapbox that she’s in consistently trying to create doubt in Elena about Elena.

Let’s make a pause and consider other things.

Note by Elena: Let’s suppose that beyond all this nitty gritty of language, what Ton is trying to tell Elena is that she comes back to the blog and presents a new set of ideas or similar ideas to those she had presented in her previous participation with new arguments that she’s been researching. We all know another of the final arguments against Elena was that she behaved as though she was Joan of Arc. She said things as if she knew them. And what Ton is trying to tell Elena is “you’re not Joan of Arc, try to get off that pedestal and consider all these other arguments”. This would of course be very valid but my question here is: Why doesn’t anyone in the fofblog including Ton, take up Elena’s arguments and contest them?

Is it because they cannot logically contest them?

There is another question being fought here, a very interesting one which is: Suppose Elena were right in what she’s presenting, does that mean that would necessarily have to follow her?

Do people have to follow those who are right or isn’t this complete conversation about cults and what Elena has been standing up for, precisely about the fact that the individual must stand up for him and herself and not follow anyone else blindly?
There are many subtle problems in the questions that poses.

One of the questions is that although Elena might have been “right” about very many things, things that she pointed out from the beginning and that she fought against and that gradually disappeared from the fofblog. In her questioning of people’s behavior many people changed their behavior in relation to that particular act but the animosity against Elena kept growing and Elena, being far from being an enlightened perfect being answered with equal animosity against many. That animosity is very clear before Elena was banned. Laughing in their faces was the final deed! Laughing at the idea that they had been so patient tolerating her and telling them how patient she’d been tolerating them. Why would they ever forgive her?

So the subsequent facts we have are that she indeed apologizes and returns to the blog and tries to present her questions with better arguments but Ton soon takes care of taking care of her. He feels rather well prepared. In his participation in Elena’s blog, which could be easily read if anyone can bother to, he has convinced himself that Elena is sick and that she can be driven out of her convictions fairly easily. What is he really trying to do? He is supposed to be trying to convince Elena that she is sick and that she needs to work on herself not to be sick. He clearly doesn’t really care about any of Elena’s arguments, what he’s trying to accomplish is putting Elena in her place or what he considers her place to be. Her sickness is feeling that she’s right. Her sickness, if I understand Ton, is that she’s got an ego the size of the Sun! So what he sets out to do is to convince Elena that her ego is as small as a lice and that she doesn’t have a right to think she’s right. So his argument is filled with tools to destroy Elena’s sense of herself and when he doesn’t accomplish it, the fofblogmoderator bans her!!!!

It’s quite a play!!
End of part five  

No comments:

Post a Comment