The Separation between State and Religion

In time we will realize that Democracy is the entitlement of individuals to every right that was in its times alloted to kings. The right to speak and decide, to be treated with decency, to serve and be served by people in a State of “love” that is, to serve with one’s work for the development of ‘life’. To belong to the Kingdom of Human Beings without racial, national, social or academic separations. To love and be loved. To die at the service of the whole and be honored in one’s death, for one’s life and work was legitimately valued. To be graceful and grateful. To have the pride and the humility of being One with the Universe, One with every realm of Existence, One with every living and deceased soul. To treat with dignity and be treated with dignity for One is dignified together with All others and Life itself. To walk the path of compassion, not in the sorrow of guilt but in the pride of being. To take responsability for one’s mistakes and sufferings and stand up again and again like a hero and a heroine and face the struggle that is put at one’s feet and in one’s hands. Millions of people, millions and millions of people might take many generations to realize the consciousness of our humaneness but there is no other dignified path for the human being.

The “work” as I conceive it is psychological and political. Psychology is the connection between the different dimensions within one’s self and Politics is the actualization of that consciousness in our practical lives. Religion is the ceremony that binds the connectedness between the individual and the Universe. The separation between religion, politics and science, the arts and sports is, in the sphere of the social, the reflection of the schizophrenia within the individual and the masses. The dialogue between individuality and the "human" belongs to consciousness. The tendency to develop cults resides in the shortcomings we’are finding in life as it is structured today. “Life” has become the private property of a few priviledged who cannot profit from it because as soon as it is appropriated it stops to be “life” or “life-giving”.

We are all the victims of our own invention and each one is called upon to find solutions. The only problem is believing our selves incapable of finding them. We are now free to use all Systems of knowledge objectively, sharing them without imposing our will on each other. To become objective about our lives means to understand that the institutions that govern its experience are critically important. That we are one with the governments, one with the religious activities that mark its pace, that the arena’s in which we move our bodies and the laboratories in which we explore our possibilities are ALL part and parcel of our own personal responsibility. That WE ARE ONE WITH EACH OTHER AND EVERYTHING AROUND US and acknowledge for ourselves a bond of love in conscious responsibility. That we human beings know ourselves part of each other and are willing and able to act on our behalf for the benefit of each and every individual. That we no longer allow governments, industries, universities or any other institution to run along unchecked by the objective principles of humaneness. That we do not allow gurus to abuse their power or governors to steal the taxes and use them to their personal advantage in detriment of the whole. That we do not allow abuse from anyone anywhere because life is too beautiful to do so and that we are willing to stop the rampant crime with the necessary compassion Conscious knowledge is every individual's right. Conscious action is every individual's duty.

Tuesday 28 September 2010

We are One - Objective Art

There's nothing really contradictory between what you're saying to what I'm saying. If you can hear the music of the Germans and hold them as human beings then you can despise their fascism and still be objectively conscious. To despise the burning of women with a cigarette does not fight with consciousness, it actualizes it. Such acts can be despised but that does not take away the human condition of the perpetrator and acting inhumanly towards him or her is as unconscious as his or her act. You can call yourself an initiate candidate and humanism "crap" but if you can't be human, there's no consciousness in your being.


A dialogue is a dialogue and if you burn other people's voice with your imposition of the uniqueness of your point of view and its absoluteness, you're no better than Picasso burning his women with cigarettes.


Crap? So easy to discard other people and other people's voice with words like that. What more would you do to keep the throne of your unique point of view?

What matters here is not your or my ideas but our ability to sit with each other and dialogue like human beings. If that is not the aim of your conscious objectivity and you feel you have to hit hard on others because they don't agree with you because you hold the bible in your hands, please let me know so that I can remain elsewhere. It will not be the first time I am banned for standing up and questioning behavior like yours. If you really wanted to listen to others you would have realized that we're actually saying the same thing you said in your second post and there's no need to undermine me with labels like crap. Objective Art? Conscience?


We can't even begin to dialogue about objective art or conscience if we cannot respect each other's equality in the forum and guarantee each other's freedom to speak. M. has said this is not a site only for Gurdjieff and his point of view of the world, you can bring whatever you like but that does not make you better than anybody else nor does it make you have the right to speak more than anybody else or condition me to remain silent. Objectivity can only take place when we allow each other to be and pull our selves together enough to hold each other no matter the struggle between us.  That is the first step: To be. The qualities of being are that we can express ourselves freely, that we can participate, that we have a right to be treated with dignity. Cults love destroying everything the human being has struggled for so that they can hold themselves up as the new "saviours" of their times but real teachers don't destroy the traces of consciousness in society or separate individuals from the human being. You don't understand Gurdjieff or his system if you can't be conscious in life, simple regular everyday life with all its nuisances and demands. If you enjoy crap and eat crap in every day life, that is the reality you make objective in your subjectivity. Only cults and people who wish to establish hierarchies between each other stand up for being more special than the rest and think they have the "authority" to diminish others in words or actions because people don't blindly comply to their expressions of "power". Your tone and harshness doesn't intimidate me. I've been to hell and back, and been the devil like you. There's nothing in it of any value to human or conscious progress if we cannot come to love after that.


Much more important than Picasso is what he was objectively able to convey about his own struggle and that of his times. We are not looking for saints in our times but people like you and me who can recognize the devil inside and hold it to its knees. Picasso's Art is no less Art because he was a violent man at times. His violence may speak badly about him but his Art reveals his human spirit, and there is NOTHING more spiritual or conscious than our humanity. You cannot judge a man without understanding his times. The pressure of Germans to come to grips with the fact that each individual must respond for his and her acts way beyond what he or she is being ordered by his or her superiors and entourage is the pressure of all of mankind today. That possibility of holding our selves up to our individual conscience and humanly respond for each other is objective consciousness. Discarding each other with made up justifications of how great our beliefs are is another form of fascism.

Have you really forgotten what it is to be human, like so many people in our times?

Monday 27 September 2010

The "Objectivity" of essence



Hi ...,

I think even Picasso is an aspect of objective reality with all his subjectivity and that is what needs to be grasped to stop disqualifying human beings for no matter what reason. We all carry light and darkness within our selves and no matter how dark some things seem, if we forget the light we all carry within we justify our acts of disqualification and that is not consciousness or humaneness or life or love.

The men in Picasso's times and age are not too different to the men today. If we look at that kind of "masculinity" as a phenomenon to be worked on rather than a malady to be pointed at and disqualified, then we are looking at the problem objectively and not subjectively. The subjectivity of "Picasso" hardly matters when you want to look at phenomenon objectively.

There is a "life" in Picasso's works that if that is not objectivity, allow me to keep myself endlessly subjective and not ban me for it. The Art of our times is no less objective no matter how subjective its artists might be. In as much as we can see Art as the objective expression of our subjective state, we can recognize the different degrees of conscious objectivity in the artist but can NEVER disqualify the essence of the artist. Essence is a human reality as objective as the spirit. So is false personality for that matter. No matter how false, false personality might be, the "objective reality" of that individual is that he or she is in a process in which his or her false personality is predominant. These are just phases of development and NO ONE on this earth should be disqualified because of it. We are not here to judge and disqualify each other but to hold each other like friends and family and children and brothers and sisters and parents and human beings. And help each other every step of the way no matter how many times we've fallen or fall.

I'm passionate about this my friend, but mean you no harm. Let Picasso be Picasso that we don't loose any of our selves in the way. He has spoken for the soul of his times better than many. It does us no harm to hear what he had to say.


Wednesday 22 September 2010

Objectivity

Nice compilation R, thanks. If I may add my two cents, M's question goes straight to the point: "What are objective feelings?"

First we have G. stating that they are connected with consciousness of unity of all things. If we review the System we’ll find that we can only perceive objectively with the higher emotional centre.

The sentence: “Do not love art with your feelings.” was probably directed at students at the Prieurie who tended to perceive art from the jacks of centres instead of the kings and “subjectify” the experience instead of “assimilating” it in the sphere of the I and remain in the kings. I’m using “assimilating” meaning allowing the experience to permeate one’s being without identification but at the same time with acceptance and openness. In the process of “subjectification” through identification, the individual makes his own self, his or her thoughts and emotions the focus of the experience and loses the opportunity to experience the work of art or life in general, objectively. “Life” is in the work of art and the individual can express how much HE likes it and all the things that happen to him or her while looking at it or they can let it impregnate their being. There is an objective current of impressions between the work of art and the individual, life and the individual. That objective current of impressions is what the conscious individual can take in consciously and the unconscious individual takes in unconsciously. The current is the same and people are feeding on these currents of impressions or energies all the time, knowingly or unknowingly. There are different degrees of energy or “hidrogens” in the Greek temples or other “conscious” works of architecture and a simple little house. The sacred temple is designed to place the individual within a structure of objectivity that aligns his own self with the many dimensions within his own self and the world outside. The simple little house is more in “essence” than the temple and in the modern shopping malls that have replaced the temple, the “unity” experienced in temples is lost. Each little shop attracts different parts of centres and the “separation” of life experiences is enforced. The “market” has disconnected from people’s sphere of communication in communal life, it has “objectified itself” beyond the community and strengthens individualism. Oneness arises where both the inner and outer world meet in the individual. Conscious works are designed to remind the human being of his own self in the physical as much as the spiritual dimension. The laws within the physical world coincide with the laws in the spiritual world, the “metaphor” of life is the “metaphor” of spiritual dimensions.

In the subjective state of consciousness the individual places himself in the “identification with his own self” as “centre of the universe”. In the objective state of consciousness, the individual lives both in the periphery of unity and in the central axis of his or her being. There is no difference between the periphery or the axis, these are simply “symbols” with which an idea can be expressed. In the central axis of a human being’s being is the Universe or periphery: wholeness.

Feelings in the lower emotional centre or subjective feelings are such because they are filtered through the individual’s “ego” or “false personality” (in the system). False not in terms of “bad”, simply in terms of not real. It is not real because the human being’s destiny is to develop full consciousness and in the meantime, the “persona” occupying the seat is “subjective”, “false”. False and subjective is talking about a moment in a process, not a reality, the spiritual aspects of the human being are still in this subjective human being whose is hence, no less “sacred”. To be subjective is not to not be human, it is simply to be a human being in a certain state of development. Emotions in this phase of development are not objective because impressions “die” in the superficiality of his or her being touching only the external I or the I connected and identified only with the sphere of the physical dimension and his or her own personality within that dimension. There may be “happy” emotions but not “positive” emotions. “Objective emotions” as presented in the System are emotions that cannot become negative, that are not under the law of accident. “Love” as understood in states of identification is not experienced in states of consciousness because there is no separateness between beings and therefore no desire or longing. Love is then experienced as “life” or “objective reality”. The experience of delight before conscious works is different to experiences in the lower emotional centre in that “delight” touches directly the sphere of the I and not the sphere of subjective feelings. Delight I believe is: “of light”, “from light”. Just as negative emotions tend to enforce the development of false personality, “positive” emotions in the higher emotional centre tend to enforce the development of true personality. Conscious works of art are meant to enforce the development of the human being as an individual as much as a community. Temples, cathedrals, were not meant for individualism to spread but for consciousness to evolve but individualism, like the ego and subjectivity are just a phase in the process.

I’d like to further address your posts but this is already long, maybe tomorrow. Thank you for the opportunity to share and clarify these things for our selves. Elena 

Tuesday 21 September 2010

We are One


Hi Will,

How would you connect the different alchemies or the one alchemy in different spheres? and the exoteric and esoteric?

You invite me and tell me that when I come you'll show me things but I am here and if you have anything you wish to show this is your opportunity. It is also fine not to show anything and simply share ourselves without making up excuses of why we enjoy being together or presenting little baits so that we come even closer! When there's no agenda to be together then we settle in our selves, contented. Wouldn't that be the alchemy of being? To let each other be without competing? What competes, cannot be real.  To be delighted in each other's presence and not have to justify that? To let each other give all of our light (and every human being has as much of it as any other no matter where they come from or what they do, if you give them the opportunity, they will each give as much light as anybody else. And "giving" the opportunity is not placing them in a pedestal but remaining there for them without closing doors and erecting walls of separation justifying the pedestal in which one's ego has placed one's self in the suffering of not being).

We want to be loved because we don't know what being is. When we ARE, we love without wanting. The question of desire roots itself in "beinglessness": the ego wants what it doesn't have. When we achieve inside what the ego is looking for, we can take what is there with joy and gratitude but the ego is never satisfied, it has to deny. It is always putting everything and anything around itself down so that it can float above convinced that it shines in the mud. We are all there in different degrees and we are all out of there in different degrees. Life is life: the commitment to unity and the endless struggle against separationism, today, in our inner selves as much as in our communities and the world at large.

We are One, we're just not conscious of our oneness and in that unconsciousness we separate each other from each other in our acts: that is suffering. When each of our acts connects us to each other then life pours its light in our selves and everything we do gives delight. Every job, every creation, every relationship is an act of giving, every individual in his and her own way is a giver. When we don't deny each other what we are giving, then creation is possible because we are each endless creators. The whole system of injustice today does not come from the economic sphere but from the unconsciousness with which we treat each other's being neglecting to acknowledge our humanity.

The system of hierarchies in which the political and economic spheres place people is a symptom of our unconsciousness, not the cause. The economic differences and the relationships of power cannot change until we are each more conscious of our Oneness as human beings.

Thanks for sharing.

Saturday 18 September 2010

Arab influences in our lives-


Alchemy and chemistry in medieval Islam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Alchemy and chemistry in Islam refers to the study of both traditional alchemy and early practical chemistry (the early chemical investigation of nature in general) by scientists in the medieval Islamic world. The word alchemy itself was derived from the Arabic word الكيمياء al-kimia, in turn derived from the Persian word کيميا kimia.
After the fall of the Roman Empire, the focus of alchemical development moved to the Arab Empire and the Islamic civilization. Much more is known about Islamic alchemy as it was better documented; indeed, most of the earlier writings that have come down through the years were preserved as Arabic translations.[1]
The study of alchemy and chemistry often overlapped in the early Islamic world, but later there were disputes between the traditional alchemists and the practical chemists who discredited alchemy. Muslim chemists and alchemists were the first to employ theexperimental scientific method (as practised in modern chemistry), while Muslim alchemists also developed theories on the transmutation of metals, the philosopher's stone and the Takwin (artificial creation of life in the laboratory), like in later medieval European alchemy, though these alchemical theories were rejected by practical Muslim chemists from the 9th century onwards.

[edit]Contributions to alchemy

The Islamic world was a melting pot for alchemy. Islamic philosophers made great contributions to alchemical hermeticism. The most influential author in this regard was arguably Jābir ibn Hayyān (جابر بن حيان, Latin Geberus; usually rendered in English as Geber). He analyzed each Aristotelian element in terms of four basic qualities of hotnesscoldnessdryness, and moistness.[2] According to Jābir, in each metal two of these qualities were interior and two were exterior. For example, lead was externally cold and dry, while gold was hot and moist. Thus, Jabir theorized, by rearranging the qualities of one metal, a different metal would result.[2] By this reasoning, the search for the philosopher's stone was introduced to Western alchemy.[3][4] Jabir developed an elaborate numerology whereby the root letters of a substance's name in Arabic, when treated with various transformations, held correspondences to the element's physical properties.
The elemental system used in medieval alchemy was developed by Jābir ibn Hayyān (Geber). His original system consisted of seven elements, which included the five classical elements (aetherairearthfire and water), in addition to two chemical elements representing the metalssulphur, ‘the stone which burns’, which characterized the principle of combustibility, and mercury, which contained the idealized principle of metallic properties. Shortly thereafter, this evolved into eight elements, with the Arabic concept of the three metallic principles: sulphur giving flammability or combustion, mercury giving volatility and stability, and salt giving solidity.[5][verification needed]
Muslim alchemists also developed theories on the transmutation of metals, the philosopher's stone and the Takwin (artificial creation of life in the laboratory), like in later medieval European alchemy, though these alchemical theories were rejected by practical Muslim chemists from the 9th century onwards.

[edit]Beginnings of chemistry

Jābir ibn Hayyān (Geber), considered the "father of chemistry", introducedexperimentation, invented the alembic stilland retort, many chemical processes such as filtration, and many chemical substancessuch as distilled alcohol. He also established the perfumery industry.
Muhammad ibn Zakariya ar-Razi(Rhazes) isolated many chemical substances, produced many medications, and described many laboratory apparatus.
Early Islamic chemists such as Jabir ibn HayyanAl-Kindi (Latinized as Alkindus) and Al-Razi(Latinized as Rasis or Rhazes) contributed key chemical discoveries, including:
An early experimental scientific method for chemistry began emerging among early Muslim chemists. The first and most influential was the 9th century chemist, Jābir ibn Hayyān, who is "considered by many to be the father of chemistry",[6][7][8][9] for introducing:
Jabir clearly recognized and proclaimed the importance of experimentation:
The first essential in chemistry is that thou shouldest perform practical work and conduct experiments, for he who performs not practical work nor makes experiments will never attain to the least degree of mastery."[11]
The historian of chemistry E. J. Holmyard gives credit to Jabir for his part in the development of alchemy into an experimental science and he writes that Jabir's importance to the history of chemistry is equal to that of Robert Boyle and Antoine Lavoisier.[12] The historian Paul Kraus, who had studied most of Jabir's extant works in Arabic and Latin, summarized the importance of Jabir ibn Hayyan to the history of chemistry by comparing his experimental and systematic works in chemistry with that of the allegorical and unintelligble works of the ancient Greekalchemists:[13]
"To form an idea of the historical place of Jabir's alchemy and to tackle the problem of its sources, it is advisable to compare it with what remains to us of the alchemical literature in the Greek language. One knows in which miserable state this literature reached us. Collected by Byzantine scientists from the tenth century, the corpus of the Greek alchemists is a cluster of incoherent fragments, going back to all the times since the third century until the end of the Middle Ages."
"The efforts of Berthelot and Ruelle to put a little order in this mass of literature led only to poor results, and the later researchers, among them in particular Mrs. Hammer-Jensen, Tannery, Lagercrantz, von Lippmann, Reitzenstein, Ruska, Bidez, Festugiere and others, could make clear only few points of detail…"
The study of the Greek alchemists is not very encouraging. An even surface examination of the Greek texts shows that a very small part only was organized according to true experiments of laboratory: even the supposedly technical writings, in the state where we find them today, are unintelligible nonsense which refuses any interpretation.
It is different with Jabir's alchemy. The relatively clear description of the processes and the alchemical apparatuses, the methodical classification of the substances, mark an experimental spirit which is extremely far away from the weird and odd esotericism of the Greek texts. The theory on which Jabir supports his operations is one of clearness and of an impressive unity. More than with the other Arab authors, one notes with him a balance between theoretical teaching and practical teaching, between the `ilm and the `amal. In vain one would seek in the Greek texts a work as systematic as that which is presented for example in the Book of Seventy.”
Jabir's teacher, Ja'far al-Sadiq, refuted Aristotle's theory of the four classical elements and discovered that each one is made up of different chemical elements:
"I wonder how a man like Aristotle could say that in the world there are only four elements - EarthWaterFire, and Air. The Earth is not an element. It contains many elements. Each metal, which is in the earth, is an element."[14]
Al-Sadiq also developed a particle theory, which he described as follows:
"The universe was born out of a tiny particle, which had two opposite poles. That particle produced an atom. In this waymatter came into being. Then the matter diversified. This diversification was caused by the density or rarity of the atoms."[14]
Al-Sadiq also wrote a theory on the opacity and transparency of materials. He stated that materials which are solid and absorbent are opaque, and materials which are solid and repellent are more or less transparent. He also stated that opaque materials absorb heat.[14]
Al-Kindi, who was a chemist and an opponent of alchemy, was the first to refute the study of traditional alchemy and the theory of thetransmutation of metals into more precious metals such as gold or silver.[15] Abū Rayhān al-Bīrūnī,[16] Avicenna[17] and Ibn Khaldunwere also opponents of alchemy who refuted the theory of the transmutation of metals.
Another influential Muslim chemist was al-Razi (Rhazes), who in his Doubts about Galen, was the first to prove both Aristotle's theory ofclassical elements and Galen's theory of humorism wrong using an experimental method. He carried out an experiment which would upset these theories by inserting a liquid with a different temperature into a body resulting in an increase or decrease of bodily heat, which resembled the temperature of that particular fluid. Al-Razi noted particularly that a warm drink would heat up the body to a degree much higher than its own natural temperature, thus the drink would trigger a response from the body, rather than transferring only its own warmth or coldness to it. Al-Razi's chemical experiments further suggested other qualities of matter, such as "oiliness" and "sulfurousness", or inflammability and salinity, which were not readily explained by the traditional fire, water, earth and air division of elements.[citation needed] Al-Razi was also the first to:
In the 13th century Nasīr al-Dīn al-Tūsī stated a version of the law of conservation of mass, noting that a body of matter is able to change, but is not able to disappear.[18]
From the 12th century, the writings of Jābir ibn Hayyānal-Kindial-Razi and Avicenna became widely known in Europe during theArabic-Latin translation movement and later through the Latin writings of a pseudo-Geber, an anonymous alchemist born in 14th century Spain, who translated more of Jabir's books into Latin and wrote some of his own books under the pen name of "Geber".

[edit]The Alchemists

There are more Islamic figures within chemistry than is generally acknowledged in the literature on the subject.
More recent research into the matter has provided a string outline. Regarding Muslim chemists beginning with the Umayyad PrinceKhalid Ibn Yazid (Calid)(d.704), Ja'far al-SadiqJabir Ibn Hayyan and Ibn Wahshiyya (.870) who wrote chemical works which were subsequently used by Al-Dimashqi in his Mineralogy. al-Razi and Muhammed ibn Umail al-Tamimi (wrote Miftah al-hikma al-'uzma). Al-Farabi (d. 950) and Ibn Badis on Silver filling also wrote on chemistry, and were succeeded chronologically by a chemist from Spain, Al-Majriti (d. 1007), ZiryabAbu al-SaltIbn al-Wafid of Toledo (Abenguefit) and Ibn ar-Tafiz (Artephius) of Córdoba in Islamic Spain[19].
In Baghdad and nearby, Al-Khwarizmi al-Khati (.1034) (not the mathematician), who wrote Ain al-San'a wa awn al-Sunâ (The essential of the Art and the Help for the Artisans), Ibn SinaAbū Rayhān al-Bīrūnī and Abu Mansur Muwaffaq of Herat. In the 12th century came to prominence the famous Seljuk vizier-scholar Al-Tughrai (d.1122) who wrote numerous works such as Kitab al-anwar wa'l mafatih. Later in the same century flourished Ahmad Ibn Imad ul-dinAbul Hasan ibn Musa ibn Arfa Ra'a (d. 1197) who is the author of Shudhur al-dahab(The Gold Spangle), Al-Nabarawi and al-Khazini. In the early 14th century Al-SimawiIbn Rassam, then the famed al-Jaldaki (c. 1342), Abul Ashba ibn Tammam (d.1361) and Hassan al-Rammah.[20]

[edit]Legacy

Alexander von Humboldt regarded the Muslim chemists as the true founders of chemistry.[21] Will Durant wrote in The Story of Civilization IV: The Age of Faith:
"Chemistry as a science was almost created by the Moslems; for in this field, where the Greeks (so far as we know) were confined to industrial experience and vague hypothesis, the Saracens introduced precise observationcontrolled experiment, and careful records. They invented and named the alembic (al-anbiq), chemically analyzed innumerablesubstances, composed lapidaries, distinguished alkalis and acids, investigated their affinities, studied and manufactured hundreds of drugs. Alchemy, which the Moslems inherited from Egypt, contributed to chemistry by a thousand incidental discoveries, and by its method, which was the most scientific of all medieval operations."[22]
Fielding H. Garrison wrote in the History of Medicine:
"The Saracens themselves were the originators not only of algebrachemistry, and geology, but of many of the so-called improvements or refinements of civilization, such as street lamps, window-panesfireworkstringed instruments, cultivated fruits, perfumes, spices, etc..."[23]
Robert Briffault wrote in The Making of Humanity:
"Chemistry, the rudiments of which arose in the processes employed by Egyptian metallurgists and jewellers—combining metals into various alloys and 'tinting' them to resemble gold—processes long preserved as a secret monopoly of the priestly colleges, and clad in the usual mystic formulas, developed in the hands of the Arabs into a widespread, organized passion for research which led them to the invention of distillationsublimationfiltration, to the discovery of alcohol, ofnitric and sulfuric acids (the only acid known to the ancients was vinegar), of the alkalis, of the salts of mercury, ofantimony and bismuth, and laid the basis of all subsequent chemistry and physical research."[10]
George Sarton, the father of the history of science, wrote in the Introduction to the History of Science:
"We find in his (Jabir, Geber) writings remarkably sound views on methods of chemical research, a theory on the geologic formation of metals (the six metals differ essentially because of different proportions of sulfur and mercury in them); preparation of various substances (e.g., basic lead carbonaticarsenic and antimony from their sulfides)."[24]

[edit]Chemical processes

File:Steam Distillation.JPG
Laboratory setup for steam distillation, invented by Avicenna in the 11th century.
Geber and Ahmad Ibn Imad ul-din invented the following chemical processes in the 8th century:
Al-Razi invented the following chemical processes in the 9th century:
Other chemical processes introduced by Muslim chemists include:

[edit]Laboratory apparatus

[edit]Distillation apparatus

The alembic was invented and named by the Muslim chemist Geber. The still was also invented by Geber as part of the alembic.[22]
The chemical retort used for distillation was invented by Geber as part of the alembic, and was widely used by later Muslim scientists. The retort was later introduced to the West by 1570.[30][not in citation given]
In the 11th century, Avicenna invented the refrigerated coil, which condenses aromatic vapours.[31][32]This was a breakthrough in distillation technology and he made use of it in his steam distillationprocess, which requires refrigerated tubing, to produce essential oils.[28]

[edit]Other chemistry equipment

Muslim chemists and engineers invented the cucurbit and aludel, and the equipment needed for melting metals such as furnaces andcrucibles.[26]
In his Secretum secretorum (Latinized title), Al-Razi (Rhazes) described the following tools that were invented by him and his Muslim predecessors (CalidGeber and al-Kindi) for melting substances (li-tadhwib): hearth (kur), bellows (minfakh aw ziqq), crucible (bawtaqa), the but bar but (in Arabic) or botus barbatus (in Latin), tongs (masik aq kalbatan), scissors (miqta), hammer (mukassir), file (mibrad).[25]
Al-Razi also described the following tools that were invented by him and his Muslim predecessors for the preparation of drugs (li-tadbir al-aqaqir): cucurbit and still with evacuation tube (qar aq anbiq dhu-khatm), receiving matras (qabila), blind still (without evacuation tube) (al-anbiq al-ama), Alembic al-inbiqaludel (al-uthal), goblets (qadah), flasks (qarura or quwarir), rosewater flasks (ma wariyya), cauldron(marjal aw tanjir), earthenware pots varnished on the inside with their lids (qudur aq tanjir), water bath or sand bath (qadr), oven (al-tannurin Arabic, athanor in Latin), small cylindirical oven for heating aludel (mustawqid), funnelssievesfilters, etc.[25]
From the list, more than twenty of these chemical apparatus were developed by Geber.[33]

[edit]Physics apparatus

Abū Rayhān al-Bīrūnī invented the conical measure,[34] in order to find the ratio between the weight of a substance in air and the weight of water displaced, and to accurately measure the specific weights of the gemstones and their corresponding metals, which are very close to modern measurements.[35]
Abū Rayhān al-Bīrūnī also invented the laboratory flask and pycnometer in the early 11th century, and the hydrostatic balance andsteelyard were invented by al-Khazini in the early 12th century. The earliest descriptions for these instruments are found in al-Khazini'sThe Book of the Balance of Wisdom (1121).[36]
Biruni's contemporary Ibn al-Haytham gave the first clear description[37] and correct analysis[38] of the camera obscura and pinhole camera.

[edit]Chemical substances

Aqua regia was first prepared by Geber.
Hydrochloric acid, a mineral acid, was first isolated by Geber.
Nitric acid, a mineral acid, was first isolated by Geber.
Sulfuric acid, a mineral acid, was first isolated by Geber.
Arsenic, a chemical element, was first isolated by Geber in the 8th century.

[edit]Acids

The only acid known to the ancients was vinegar. Using new equipment such as the alembicand processes such as pure distillation, Muslim chemists were the first to discover and isolate a variety of new acids, such as nitric acid and sulfuric acid.[10]
The important mineral acids—nitric, sulfuric and hydrochloric acids—were all first produced by Geber. These have remained some of the most common products in the chemical industry for over a thousand years.[26]
Acetic acid was also first concentrated from vinegar through distillation by Geber in the 8th century.[6] He is also credited with the discovery of citric acid (the sour component of lemons and other unripe fruits) and tartaric acid (from wine-making residues).[6]

[edit]Chemical elements

Several chemical elements were first discovered by Geber: arsenicantimony andbismuth.[10][33][39] Geber was also the first to classify sulfur (‘the stone which burns’ that characterized the principle of combustibility) and mercury (which contained the idealized principle of metallic properties) as 'elements'.[5]
Lead and tin were also first purified and clearly differentiated from one another by Arabic alchemists.[40]

[edit]Derivative and artificial substances

In the 10th century Muhammad ibn Zakarīya Rāzi wrote that he and his Muslim predecessors (CalidGeber and al-Kindi) invented the following derivative and artificial chemical substances:lead(II) oxide (PbO), red lead (Pb3O4), tin(II) oxide (Isfidaj), copper acetate (Zaniar), copper(II) oxide (CuO), lead sulfidezinc oxidebismuth oxideantimony oxide, iron rustiron acetate,Daws (a contituent of steel), cinnabar (HgS), arsenic trioxide (As2O3), alkali (al-Qili), sodium hydroxide (caustic soda), and Qalimiya (anything that separates from metals during theirpurification).[41]

[edit]Distilled alcohol

The isolation of ethanol (alcohol) as a pure compound was first achieved by Muslim chemists who developed the art of distillation during the Abbasid caliphate, the most notable of whom were Jābir ibn Hayyān (Geber), Al-Kindi (Alkindus) and al-Razi (Rhazes). The writings attributed to Jabir ibn Hayyan (721-815) mention the flammable vapors of boiled wine. Al-Kindi (801-873) unambiguously described the distillation of wine.[42] This may have been for the purpose of separating alcoholic content from drinks due to the Islamic prohibition of alcohol consumption.
Muslim chemists were the first to produce fully purified distilled alcohol from the 8th century and manufactured them on a large scale from at least the 10th century, for use in medicineand the chemical and pharmaceutical industries, though it was rarely used for drinking due to the Islamic prohibition of alcohol consumption.[21][26] Alcohol was still consumed by non-Muslims in the Islamic world however.
"The distillation of wine and the properties of alcohol were known to Islamic chemists from the eighth century. The prohibition of wine in Islam did not mean that wine was not produced or consumed or that Arab alchemists did not subject it to their distillation processes. Jabir ibn Hayyan described a cooling technique which can be applied to the distillation of alcohol."[42]

[edit]Medicinal substances

Muslim chemists and physicians discovered and produced at least 2,000 medicinalsubstances for use in medicine and the pharmaceutical sciences.[43]
Ibn al-Wafid of Toledo (Abenguefit), was among the most famous pharmacists and chemists during the Renaissance. His main work is Kitab al-adwiya al-mufrada (translated into Latin asDe medicamentis simplicibus) was printed in Latin more than fifty times.

[edit]Natural substances

In the 10th century Muhammad ibn Zakarīya Rāzi classified the natural chemical substancesthat were discovered by him and his Muslim predecessors (mainly Calid, Geber, al-Kindi andal-Tamimi) as follows:[41]

[edit]Vegetable and animal substances

Muhammad ibn Zakarīya Rāzi writes that the only vegetable substance used by Muslim alchemists are the ashes of the Ushnan plant, from which they produced alkali metals and alkali salts. Razi also lists ten animal substances that were used by him and his contemporary alchemists: hairskullsbrainsbilebloodmilkurineeggsnacre (mother of pearl) and horn. He writes that hair, brains, bile, eggs, skulls and blood were used to prepare sal ammoniac.[41]

[edit]Other substances

Through their experiments with various chemical compounds, Arabic chemists first produced many other chemical substances, including:
Geber was also the first to classify all seven classical metalsgoldsilvertinleadmercuryiron and copper.[26]

[edit]Chemical industries

A number of chemical substances and products were developed by Muslim chemists for use in the chemical industries.

[edit]Ceramics and pottery

Tin-glazed Hispano-Moresque ware withlusterware decoration, from Spain circa1475.
From the eighth to eighteenth centuries, the use of glazed ceramics was prevalent in Islamic art, usually assuming the form of elaborate pottery.[44] Tin-opacified glazing was one of the earliest new technologies developed by the Islamic potters. The first Islamic opaque glazes can be found as blue-painted ware in Basra, dating to around the 8th century. Another significant contribution was the development of stonepaste ceramics, originating from 9th century Iraq.[45] The first industrial complex for glass and pottery production was built in Ar-RaqqahSyria, in the 8th century.[46] Other centers for innovative ceramic pottery in the Islamic world included Fustat (from 975 to 1075), Damascus (from 1100 to around 1600) andTabriz (from 1470 to 1550).[47]
Another innovation was the albarello, a type of maiolica earthenware jar originally designed to hold apothecaries' ointments and dry drugs. The development of this type of pharmacy jar had its roots in the Islamic Middle East. Brought to Italy by Hispano-Moresque traders, the earliest Italian examples were produced in Florence in the 15th century.
The Hispano-Moresque style emerged in Andalusia in the 8th century, under the Fatimids. This was a style of Islamic pottery created inIslamic Spain, after the Moors had introduced two ceramic techniques to Europe: glazing with an opaque white tin-glaze, and painting inmetallic lusters. Hispano-Moresque ware was distinguished from the pottery of Christendom by the Islamic character of it decoration.[48]

[edit]Cheese glue

In The Book of the Hidden Pearl, Geber described the first recipes for the manufacture of glue from cheese.[49]

[edit]Oil and petrolium products

From the 8th century the streets of Baghdad were the first to be paved with tar, derived from petroleum through destructive distillation. In the 9th century oil fields were exploited in the area around modern BakuAzerbaijan, to produce the earliest naphtha. These fields were described by Masudi in the 10th century, and by Marco Polo in the 13th century, who described the output of those oil wells as hundreds of shiploads.[21]
Muslim chemists were the first to produce petrol from crude oil, using the process of distillation.[50][51]
Kerosene was produced from the distillation of petroleum and was first described by al-Razi (Rhazes) in 9th century Baghdad. In hisKitab al-Asrar (Book of Secrets), he described two methods for the production of kerosene. One method involved using clay as anabsorbent, while the other method involved using ammonium chloride (sal ammoniac).[51][52] Al-Razi also described the first kerosene lamps (naffatah) used for heating and lighting in his Kitab al-Asrar (Book of Secrets). These were used in the oil lamp industry.[52]
Essential oils were first produced by Avicenna in the early 11th century, using steam distillation, for use in aromatherapy and thedrinking and perfumery industries.[28]

[edit]Plated mail

Plated mail was invented by Geber in The Book of the Hidden Pearl for use in armours (jawasin), helmets (bid) and shields (daraq).[49]

[edit]Rosewater

Rosewater was first produced by Muslim chemists through the distillation of roses, for use in the drinking and perfumery industries.[26]

[edit]Drinking industry

[edit]Coffee

An Arab named Khalid was tending his goats in the Kaffa region of Ethiopia, when he noticed his animals became livelier after eating a certain berry. He boiled the berries to make the first coffee. Certainly the first record of the drink is of beans exported from Yemen to Ethiopia where Sufis drank it to stay awake all night to pray on special occasions. By the late 15th century, it had arrived in Makkah and Turkey from where it made its way to Venice in 1645. It was brought to England in 1650 by a Greek named Pasqua Rosee who opened the first coffee house in Lombard Street in the City of London. The Arabic qahwa became the Turkish kahve, then the Italian caffè, and then English coffee.[9][53]

[edit]Distilled and purified water

Arab chemists were the first to produce distilled water and purified water, used for water supply systems and for long journeys across deserts where the supplies were uncertain.[29] In the 10th century, Abu Mansur Muwaffaq of Herat wrote The foundations of the true properties of Remedies, where he described 585 drugs. He also described the distillation of sea-water for drinking[54].
Another Alchemist to mention distilled and purified water was Ibn ar-Tafiz (Artephius) of Córdoba in Islamic Spain.
Al-Tughrai the Seljuk Vizier also patronized new methods, techniques and processes used to distill water easily.

[edit]Soft drink

Sherbet, the first juiced and carbonated soft drink, made of crushed fruit, herbs, or flowers, has long existed as one of the most popular beverages from and of the Muslim world, winning over Western figures such as Lord Byron. Muslims developed a variety of juices to make their sharab, an Arabic word from which the Italian sorbetto, French sorbet and English sherbet were derived. Today, this juice is known by a multitude of names, is associated with numerous cultural traditions, and is produced by countries ranging from India to the United States of America.[55][56]

[edit]Syrups

The medieval Muslim sources contain many recipes for drink syrups that can be kept outside the refrigerator for weeks or months.[56]

[edit]Glass industry

[edit]Glass factories

The first industrial complex for glass and pottery production was built in Ar-RaqqahSyria, in the 8th century. Extensive experimentation was carried out at the complex, which was two kilometres in length, and a variety of innovative high-purity glass were developed there. Two other similar complexes have also been discovered, and nearly three hundred new chemical recipes for glass are known to have been produced at all three sites.[46]
The first glass factories were thus built by Muslim craftsmen in the Islamic world. The first glass factories in Europe were later built in the 11th century by Egyptian craftsmen in Corinth, Greece.[26]

[edit]Clear, colourless and high-purity glass

The earliest examples of clear, colourless and high-purity glass were produced by Muslims in the 9th century, such as the quartz glassinvented by Abbas Ibn Firnas. The Arab poet al-Buhturi (820-897) describes the clarity of such glass as follows:
"Its colour hides the glass as if it is standing in it without a container."[57]
Coloured stained glass windows in theNasir al-Mulk mosque in Shiraz, Iran.

[edit]Coloured and stained glass

Stained glass was first produced by Muslim architects in Southwest Asia using coloured glass rather than stone. In the 8th century, the Arab chemist Jabir ibn Hayyan (Geber) scientifically described 46 original recipes for producing coloured glass in Kitab al-Durra al-Maknuna (The Book of the Hidden Pearl), in addition to 12 recipes inserted by al-Marrakishi in a later edition of the book.[58]

[edit]Gemstones and pearls

In his Kitab al-Durra al-Maknuna (The Book of the Hidden Pearl), Jabir described the first recipes for the manufacture of artificial pearls and for the purification of pearls that were discoloured from the sea or from grease.[49]
In The Book of the Hidden Pearl, Jabir described the first recipes for the dyeing and artificial colouring of gemstones and pearls.[49] Jabir also first described the production of high quality coloured glass cut into artificial gemstones.[57]

[edit]Mirrors

The parabolic mirror, earlier studied by Diocles and others, was described by Ibn Sahl in hisOn the Burning Instruments in the 10th century. It was later described again in Ibn al-Haytham's On Burning Mirrors and Book of Optics (1021).[59]
Ibn al-Haytham also discussed concave and convex mirrors in both cylindrical and spherical geometries,[60] described spherical and parabolic mirrors,[61] carried out a number of experiments with mirrors, and solved the problem of finding the point on a convex mirror at which a ray coming from one point is reflected to another point.[62]
By the 11th century, clear glass mirrors were being produced in Moorish Spain.[21]

[edit]Silica and quartz glass

Silica glass and Quartz glass, a clear, colourless, high-purity glass, was invented by Abbas Ibn Firnas (810-887), who was the first to produce glass from sand and stones such as quartz.[63]

[edit]Hygiene industries

[edit]Cosmetics

Early forms of cosmetics had been used since ancient times, but these were usually created primarily for the purpose of beautificationand often used harmful substances. This changed with Muslim cosmetologists who emphasized hygiene, due to religious requirements, and invented various healthy and hygienic cosmetics that are still used today.[64]
In the 9th century, Ziryab is known to have invented an early toothpaste, which he popularized throughout Islamic Spain.[65] The exact ingredients of this toothpaste are not currently known,[66] but it was reported to have been both "functional and pleasant to taste."[65] For women, he opened a beauty parlour or “cosmetology school” near Alcázar, where he taught "the use of depilatories for removing body hair", and he introduced new perfumes and cosmetics.[66] He also introduced under-arm deodorants.[67]

[edit]Soap

True soaps made from vegetable oils (such as olive oil), aromatic oils (such as thyme oil) and Sodium Lye (al-Soda al-Kawia) were first produced by Muslim chemists in the medieval Islamic world.[26] Due to washing and bathing being religious requirements for Muslims, they invented the recipe for true soap, which is still in use today, and they invented the soap bar.[9] The formula for soap used since then hasn't changed and are identical to the current soap sold in modern times.
From the beginning of the 7th century soap was produced in Nablus (Palestine), Kufa (Iraq) and Basra (Iraq). Soaps, as we know them today, are descendants of historical Arabian Soaps. Arabian Soap was perfumed and colored, while some of the soaps were liquid and others were solid. They also had special shaving soap for shaving. It was commercially sold for 3 Dirhams (0.3 Dinars) a piece in 981 AD. A manuscript of Al-Razi (Rhazes) contains various modern recipes for soap. A recently discovered manuscript from the 13th century details more recipes for soap making, e.g. take some sesame oil, a sprinkle of potashalkali and some lime, mix them all together, and boil. When cooked, they are poured into molds and left to set, leaving hard soap (soap bar).[64]

[edit]Perfumery

Islamic cultures contributed significantly to the development of perfumery in both perfecting the extraction of fragrances through steam distillation and by introducing new raw ingredients. Both the raw ingredients and distillation technology significantly influenced western perfumery and scientific developments, particularly chemistry.
As traders, Islamic cultures such as the Arabs and Persians had wider access to different spices, herbals, and other fragrance materials. In addition to trading them, many of these exotic materials were cultivated by the Muslims such that they could be successfully grown outside of their native climates. Two examples of this include jasmine, which is native to South and Southeast Asia, and various citrus fruits, which are native to East Asia. Both of these ingredients are still highly important in modern perfumery.
In Islamic culture, perfume usage has been documented as far back as the 7th century and its usage is considered a religious duty.Muhammad said:
"The taking of a bath on Friday is compulsory for every male Muslim who has attained the age of puberty and (also) the cleaning of his teeth with Siwak, and the using of perfume if it is available."
Such rituals gave incentives to scholars to search and develop a cheaper way to produce incenses and in mass production. Two talented chemists, Jabir ibn Hayyan (born 722, Iraq), and al-Kindi (born 801, Iraq) established the perfume industry. Jabir developed many techniques, including distillation, evaporation and filtration, which enabled the collection of the odour of plants into a vapour that could be collected in the form of water or oil.[68] Al-Kindi, however, was the real founder of the perfume industry, as he carried out extensive research and experiments in combining various plants and other sources to produce a variety of scent products. He elaborated a vast number of ‘recipes’ for a wide range of perfumes, cosmetics and pharmaceuticals. His work in the laboratory is reported by a witness who said:
"I received the following description, or recipe, from Abu Yusuf Ya'qub b. Ishaq al-Kindi, and I saw him making it and giving it an addition in my presence.
The writer goes on in the same section to speak of the preparation of a perfume called ghaliya, which contained musk, amber and other ingredients, and reveals a long list of technical names of drugs and apparatus.
Musk and floral perfumes were brought to Europe in the 11th and 12th centuries from Arabia, through trade with the Islamic world and with the returning Crusaders. Those who traded for these were most often also involved in trade for spices and dyestuffs. There are records of the Pepperers Guild of London, going back to 1179, which show them trading with Muslims in spices, perfume ingredients and dyes.[69]

[edit]Shampoo

Shampoo was first developed by the Bengali Muslim Sake Dean Mahomet. He introduced it to England when he opened "Mahomed's Indian Vapour Baths" in Brighton seafront in 1759. He was later appointed as a "Shampooing Surgeon" to Kings George IV and William IV.[9]