The Separation between State and Religion

In time we will realize that Democracy is the entitlement of individuals to every right that was in its times alloted to kings. The right to speak and decide, to be treated with decency, to serve and be served by people in a State of “love” that is, to serve with one’s work for the development of ‘life’. To belong to the Kingdom of Human Beings without racial, national, social or academic separations. To love and be loved. To die at the service of the whole and be honored in one’s death, for one’s life and work was legitimately valued. To be graceful and grateful. To have the pride and the humility of being One with the Universe, One with every realm of Existence, One with every living and deceased soul. To treat with dignity and be treated with dignity for One is dignified together with All others and Life itself. To walk the path of compassion, not in the sorrow of guilt but in the pride of being. To take responsability for one’s mistakes and sufferings and stand up again and again like a hero and a heroine and face the struggle that is put at one’s feet and in one’s hands. Millions of people, millions and millions of people might take many generations to realize the consciousness of our humaneness but there is no other dignified path for the human being.

The “work” as I conceive it is psychological and political. Psychology is the connection between the different dimensions within one’s self and Politics is the actualization of that consciousness in our practical lives. Religion is the ceremony that binds the connectedness between the individual and the Universe. The separation between religion, politics and science, the arts and sports is, in the sphere of the social, the reflection of the schizophrenia within the individual and the masses. The dialogue between individuality and the "human" belongs to consciousness. The tendency to develop cults resides in the shortcomings we’are finding in life as it is structured today. “Life” has become the private property of a few priviledged who cannot profit from it because as soon as it is appropriated it stops to be “life” or “life-giving”.

We are all the victims of our own invention and each one is called upon to find solutions. The only problem is believing our selves incapable of finding them. We are now free to use all Systems of knowledge objectively, sharing them without imposing our will on each other. To become objective about our lives means to understand that the institutions that govern its experience are critically important. That we are one with the governments, one with the religious activities that mark its pace, that the arena’s in which we move our bodies and the laboratories in which we explore our possibilities are ALL part and parcel of our own personal responsibility. That WE ARE ONE WITH EACH OTHER AND EVERYTHING AROUND US and acknowledge for ourselves a bond of love in conscious responsibility. That we human beings know ourselves part of each other and are willing and able to act on our behalf for the benefit of each and every individual. That we no longer allow governments, industries, universities or any other institution to run along unchecked by the objective principles of humaneness. That we do not allow gurus to abuse their power or governors to steal the taxes and use them to their personal advantage in detriment of the whole. That we do not allow abuse from anyone anywhere because life is too beautiful to do so and that we are willing to stop the rampant crime with the necessary compassion Conscious knowledge is every individual's right. Conscious action is every individual's duty.

Wednesday 3 April 2013

On the development of psychopathy

It's worth taking a look at how the hasnamuss/psychopath is trained, molded, taught to feel and behave in our present society. Teaching people to behave in a way that they don't feel so as to look good in the workplace trains the charismatic psychopath into place. They themselves suffer as much as those they hurt but they don't acknowledge it because they have trained themselves to buffer it in such a way that they'll die before accepting that there's something out of place in their charisma. It's the false ego of the age at its most powerful but children have been learning it from their executive parents for a few generations now and that is the refinement of the sociopathy. 

"Goleman encourages us to manage what we feel more than simply what we feign such that through developing our EI we learn actually to become more empathetic, sympathetic, positive, gregarious, etc. since these are the traits of ‚winners and stars.‛37 Here one can also observe the significance of emotional authenticity to the discourse of EI. Goleman 
understands the feigning of emotions as, under many circumstances, emotionally unintelligent. He advocates that we should learn to be emotionally direct, open and honest, at the right times. This honesty in human exchanges is, he suggests, in turn premised upon the ideal of ‚self-awareness‛ — greater understanding of our own emotions; learning to recognise our ‚true‛ feelings; learning to classify and monitor 
these; and so forth. In this sense, the discourse of EI evidently constitutes more than a set of emotional scripts to be per-formed irrespective of our ‚true‛ feelings. However, despite its rhetorical emphasis on emotional liberation and authenticity, the discourse of EI — particularly in relation to its emphasis on harnessing emotions for personal and professional success — equally appears to mark a continuation of processes that have involved an increasing ‚commercialisation of feeling.‛ The term ‚emotional labour‛38 
has come to gain considerable intellectual currency as a referent to such processes, and more specifically as a conceptualisation of increasingly sophisticated managerialist at- tempts to engineer corporate emotional landscapes through the exploitation of employees’ emotion management in the service of commercial ends." 

Jason Hughes 2010 
ISSN: 1832-5203 
Foucault Studies, No. 8, pp. 28-52, February 2010 

Emotional Intelligence: Elias, Foucault, and the Reflexive Emotional Self 
Jason Hughes, Brunel University

Tuesday 2 April 2013

Poem


The streets might remind us of a whole nation’s dream
but it’s when you cross the door of each house
that people’s life weaves in between
for parents are just parents… until you cross the inner street
and the father becomes The Father
while the mother is dressed in myth
and your sweet life is revealed

Gods, they too have children
And father and mother them
But parents stand in between
Time and eternity
Bring the past present
Open the future past
And condense it all in you

Parents!
They play with time like shufflers
Deal out the cards one by one
Keep the numbers tight
The stakes high
The little rivers of history
all in one:
Us!