The Separation between State and Religion

In time we will realize that Democracy is the entitlement of individuals to every right that was in its times alloted to kings. The right to speak and decide, to be treated with decency, to serve and be served by people in a State of “love” that is, to serve with one’s work for the development of ‘life’. To belong to the Kingdom of Human Beings without racial, national, social or academic separations. To love and be loved. To die at the service of the whole and be honored in one’s death, for one’s life and work was legitimately valued. To be graceful and grateful. To have the pride and the humility of being One with the Universe, One with every realm of Existence, One with every living and deceased soul. To treat with dignity and be treated with dignity for One is dignified together with All others and Life itself. To walk the path of compassion, not in the sorrow of guilt but in the pride of being. To take responsability for one’s mistakes and sufferings and stand up again and again like a hero and a heroine and face the struggle that is put at one’s feet and in one’s hands. Millions of people, millions and millions of people might take many generations to realize the consciousness of our humaneness but there is no other dignified path for the human being.

The “work” as I conceive it is psychological and political. Psychology is the connection between the different dimensions within one’s self and Politics is the actualization of that consciousness in our practical lives. Religion is the ceremony that binds the connectedness between the individual and the Universe. The separation between religion, politics and science, the arts and sports is, in the sphere of the social, the reflection of the schizophrenia within the individual and the masses. The dialogue between individuality and the "human" belongs to consciousness. The tendency to develop cults resides in the shortcomings we’are finding in life as it is structured today. “Life” has become the private property of a few priviledged who cannot profit from it because as soon as it is appropriated it stops to be “life” or “life-giving”.

We are all the victims of our own invention and each one is called upon to find solutions. The only problem is believing our selves incapable of finding them. We are now free to use all Systems of knowledge objectively, sharing them without imposing our will on each other. To become objective about our lives means to understand that the institutions that govern its experience are critically important. That we are one with the governments, one with the religious activities that mark its pace, that the arena’s in which we move our bodies and the laboratories in which we explore our possibilities are ALL part and parcel of our own personal responsibility. That WE ARE ONE WITH EACH OTHER AND EVERYTHING AROUND US and acknowledge for ourselves a bond of love in conscious responsibility. That we human beings know ourselves part of each other and are willing and able to act on our behalf for the benefit of each and every individual. That we no longer allow governments, industries, universities or any other institution to run along unchecked by the objective principles of humaneness. That we do not allow gurus to abuse their power or governors to steal the taxes and use them to their personal advantage in detriment of the whole. That we do not allow abuse from anyone anywhere because life is too beautiful to do so and that we are willing to stop the rampant crime with the necessary compassion Conscious knowledge is every individual's right. Conscious action is every individual's duty.

Blog Archive

Tuesday 11 May 2010

Naughty children and pain- BBC article.



The problem is more easily digested in this article from the bbc and my guess is that what we're doing here is actually beginning to explore the physical repercussions of how the authoritarian structures we are submitted to in our lives actually affect us, affect our I and in that affection have concrete repercussions for the whole of our lives. We are mostly talking here about people who were unable to readapt and overcome the shunning from being consistently controlled because of their social behavior. People who were too damaged to reach out for their own mechanisms of resilience. People who did not find enough help anywhere to overcome the difficulties. Since I am so familiar with these things, it is not surprising that I'm interested in the subject!

A good next step would be to explore pain. Koning says pain is LIGHT!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/8558402.stm
Children who develop behavioural problems at school are more than twice as likely to suffer chronic pain in adulthood, research has suggested.
Experts believe the finding could signal a biological link between poor behaviour and the feelings of pain experienced by some people.
Nearly 19,000 people from across the UK, all born in the same week in 1958, were tested for the study.
The results are published in the journal Rheumatology.
The researchers collated information from those studied at the ages of seven, 11 and 16, and again at 42 and 45.
Parents and teachers separately assessed each child's behaviour in areas such as restlessness, being alone, ability to make friends, obedience, sucking thumbs, lying and bullying.
           
 Until now, it was unknown whether maladjusted behaviour in children was a long-term marker for chronic widespread pain in adulthood. Our study shows that it is
Dong Pang
When the subjects reached the age of 42 they were asked to fill in a questionnaire about any psychological distress they had suffered in adult life.
At 45 they filled in another questionnaire on the amount and kind of pain they had experienced in adulthood.
The study found that 13% of the woman tested had experienced chronic widespread pain (CWP), while the figure for men was 12%.
Those youngsters whose teachers had highlighted severe and continuous behavioural problems at the ages of seven, 11 and 16 were more than twice as likely to suffer CWP in adulthood compared with children who were well behaved.
Other studies have also shown a link between poor behaviour in childhood and psychological problems in later life.
CWP is thought to affect 12% of adults and is most commonly reported in the 50 to 60 age group.
'Psychological distress'
The researchers, led by a team from the University of Aberdeen, said there could be a biological reason for the effects found in the study.
Lead author Dong Pang said: "We know already that severe adverse events in childhood such as hospitalisation after a road traffic accident and separation from mothers are linked to CWP in adulthood.
"In addition, aspects of childhood behaviour are strongly related to children reporting CWP.
"However, until now, it was unknown whether maladjusted behaviour in children was a long-term marker for CWP in adulthood. Our study shows that it is."
Mr Pang said it was possible the correlation could be explained by long-term neuroendoctrine dysfunction beginning in early life.
He said the body's stress response system had been shown to be linked to behaviour in childhood. Changes in this system have also been linked to CWP.
Professor Gary Macfarlane, who also worked on the study, said changing a person's lifestyle could help alter the pattern, including increasing the amount of exercise someone took as well as watching out for signs of psychological distress and behavioural problems in childhood.
He added: "We plan to undertake some studies in children to understand what range of factors cause a disturbance to the stress-response axis. Such work can then inform what intervention studies may be appropriate."

No comments:

Post a Comment