The Separation between State and Religion

In time we will realize that Democracy is the entitlement of individuals to every right that was in its times alloted to kings. The right to speak and decide, to be treated with decency, to serve and be served by people in a State of “love” that is, to serve with one’s work for the development of ‘life’. To belong to the Kingdom of Human Beings without racial, national, social or academic separations. To love and be loved. To die at the service of the whole and be honored in one’s death, for one’s life and work was legitimately valued. To be graceful and grateful. To have the pride and the humility of being One with the Universe, One with every realm of Existence, One with every living and deceased soul. To treat with dignity and be treated with dignity for One is dignified together with All others and Life itself. To walk the path of compassion, not in the sorrow of guilt but in the pride of being. To take responsability for one’s mistakes and sufferings and stand up again and again like a hero and a heroine and face the struggle that is put at one’s feet and in one’s hands. Millions of people, millions and millions of people might take many generations to realize the consciousness of our humaneness but there is no other dignified path for the human being.

The “work” as I conceive it is psychological and political. Psychology is the connection between the different dimensions within one’s self and Politics is the actualization of that consciousness in our practical lives. Religion is the ceremony that binds the connectedness between the individual and the Universe. The separation between religion, politics and science, the arts and sports is, in the sphere of the social, the reflection of the schizophrenia within the individual and the masses. The dialogue between individuality and the "human" belongs to consciousness. The tendency to develop cults resides in the shortcomings we’are finding in life as it is structured today. “Life” has become the private property of a few priviledged who cannot profit from it because as soon as it is appropriated it stops to be “life” or “life-giving”.

We are all the victims of our own invention and each one is called upon to find solutions. The only problem is believing our selves incapable of finding them. We are now free to use all Systems of knowledge objectively, sharing them without imposing our will on each other. To become objective about our lives means to understand that the institutions that govern its experience are critically important. That we are one with the governments, one with the religious activities that mark its pace, that the arena’s in which we move our bodies and the laboratories in which we explore our possibilities are ALL part and parcel of our own personal responsibility. That WE ARE ONE WITH EACH OTHER AND EVERYTHING AROUND US and acknowledge for ourselves a bond of love in conscious responsibility. That we human beings know ourselves part of each other and are willing and able to act on our behalf for the benefit of each and every individual. That we no longer allow governments, industries, universities or any other institution to run along unchecked by the objective principles of humaneness. That we do not allow gurus to abuse their power or governors to steal the taxes and use them to their personal advantage in detriment of the whole. That we do not allow abuse from anyone anywhere because life is too beautiful to do so and that we are willing to stop the rampant crime with the necessary compassion Conscious knowledge is every individual's right. Conscious action is every individual's duty.

Blog Archive

Saturday 22 May 2010

Global Law- Domingo Osle

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rafael_Domingo_Osle


Rafael Domingo Oslé, born in 1963 in Logroño, La Rioja (Spain), is a Spanish jurist, legal academic and professor of law who specializes in ancient Roman lawComparative law and Global law. Domingo is his first last name (in the Spanish system, people have two last names).
Rafael Domingo Oslé

Contents

 [hide]

[edit]Education

Rafael Domingo received his university law degree (J.D. 1985) and doctorate in law (J.S.D. 1987) from the University of Navarra (Pamplona, Spain), both with the highest honors. He then continued his studies at the Ludwig-Maximilians University in Munich, Germany as a scholarship recipient from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (1989 and 1995) and at the University of Rome-La Sapienza (1995). He was also a visiting scholar at the Law School of Columbia University in New York (2000 and 2009).

[edit]Academic and professional activities

After serving terms as associate professor of Roman law (1989) and tenured professor of Roman law (1993) at the University of Cantabria on Spain’s northern coast, in 1995 he was named the successor to his former teacher and mentor, the Roman law scholar Álvaro d'Ors, at the University of Navarra School of Law, where he served as Dean (1996-1999) and founding Director of the Garrigues Chair in Global Law (2003-2009). Rafael Domingo is also founding Director of The Global Law Collection by Thomson Reuters Aranzadi (2005) and founder and president of the Maiestas Foundation (2007). Domingo is Member of the Spanish Academy of Legal Science and Legislation, the Spanish Academy of Moral Sciences and Politics, the Austrian Academy of Sciences, and the Academy of Social Sciences in Cordoba (Argentina). Domingo has been awarded the Medal of Honor, Toribio Rodriguez de Mendoza, by the Peruvian Constitutional Court (2006); the Rafael Martinez Emperador Prize by the Spanish Council of the Judiciary (2007; and the Medal of Honor by the Paraguayan Academy of Law (2009).

[edit]Global law

Domingo believes that the existence of a global law, which conceptually goes beyond and takes the place of contemporary notions of traditional international law, is a requirement of our time, as was the concept of the law of nations (jus gentium) in antiquity, or that of international law in the development of the modern world[1].
According to Domingo[2], the main difference existing between traditional international law and global law is that the former is based on the concept of state sovereignty, while global law must by necessity be based upon the inherent dignity of the human person. For Domingo, the law is in fact born of the person (ex- persona oritur jus[3]), not of the State. Globalization, among its other consequences, has led to humanity as a whole acquiring legal relevance. In order to avoid domination by economic “cryptocracies”, imperialistic governments or transnational plutocracies, humanity as a collectivity must be legally and politically organized. However, the organization of humanity must not be like that of a global super-state or a sort of world-dominating empire, but rather it must be set up as an Anthroparchy[4]. This is the name that Domingo proposes for humanity’s form of government under global law. Anthroparchy would be governed by a chief institution known as United Humanity[5], the heir and successor to the UN (which would ultimately be disbanded), upon which the remaining global institutions would depend. Global law must become a true legal system, with its own rules of recognition, if one wishes to employ the terminology of H. L. A. Hart[6].
For Domingo, the recognition rule adheres to the well-known legal maxim, the inspirational rule of democratic legal systems: quod omnes tangit ab omnibus approbetur (that which affects all people must be approved by all people)[7]. The heart of the institution of United Humanity would be its Global Parliament. The unique jurisdiction and responsibility of this global legislative body would be to determine which matters are subject to that which Domingo refers to as the global legal domain[8], that is, questions which must be by their very nature regulated by global law, as well as to what extent. Global law itself would actually constitute a very small part of existing law in the world, but would be a necessary addition to the entire global framework. Acting as communicating vessels do (as in the well-known science experiment, where a number of vertical tubes of different shapes communicate at the bottom and in which, due to a law of nature, water rises to the same level in all tubes), global law would allow the balancing and harmonizing of legal systems without forcibly imposing uniformity on them. Global law’s informing principles of horizontality and subsidiarity would prevent it from overreaching its jurisdictional limits of authority, which are subject-matter based, and not territorial, in nature.

[edit]Roman law and comparative law

In the field of Roman law, Domingo has carried out critical studies of Otto Lenel’s proposed reconstruction of the Edictum Perpetuum[9], offering new considerations regarding (as well as a reconstruction of) the first edictal title on the jurisdiction of the praetor (De iurisdictione). He also has analyzed the nature of the relationship between auctoritas (authority) and potestas (power), two genuinely Roman legal concepts central to the philosophy of Alvaro d'Ors, which Domingo covers in his book entitled, Auctoritas (1999). This work provides a complete vision of Orsian thought. In the area of comparative law, Domingo has generally focused on medieval legal rules and aphorisms which are present in numerous (and differing) contemporary legal systems, in addition to the formation of modern Japanese law and, in particular, the Japanese Civil Code.

[edit]Major publications

  • Estudios sobre el primer título del Edicto del Pretor [Studies on the First Part of the Praetor’s Edict] (Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 1992, 1993, 1995)
  • Auctoritas [On Authority] (Ariel, 1999)
  • Código civil japonés. Estudio preliminar, traducción y notas [The Japanese Civil Code. Preliminary Study, Translation and Notes] (Marcial Pons 2000), con la colaboración de Nobuo Hayashi.
  • Juristas universales [Universal Jurists] (editor and coordinator), 4 vols. (Marcial Pons, 2004)
  • Ex Roma ius [From Rome, Law] (Thomson Aranzadi, 2005)
  • Álvaro d’Ors, una introducción a su obra [Alvaro d’Ors, an Introduction to his Works] (Thosmon Aranzadi, 2005)
  • Principios de Derecho Global. 1000 reglas jurídicas y aforismos comentados [Principles of Global Law. 1000 Legal Rules and Commented Aphorisms] (editor and coordinator) (Thomson Aranzadi, 2006)
  • ¿Qué es el Derecho Global? [What is Global Law?] (Thomson Reuters Aranzadi, 2008)
  • The New Global Law (Cambridge University Press, 2010)

No comments:

Post a Comment