The Separation between State and Religion

In time we will realize that Democracy is the entitlement of individuals to every right that was in its times alloted to kings. The right to speak and decide, to be treated with decency, to serve and be served by people in a State of “love” that is, to serve with one’s work for the development of ‘life’. To belong to the Kingdom of Human Beings without racial, national, social or academic separations. To love and be loved. To die at the service of the whole and be honored in one’s death, for one’s life and work was legitimately valued. To be graceful and grateful. To have the pride and the humility of being One with the Universe, One with every realm of Existence, One with every living and deceased soul. To treat with dignity and be treated with dignity for One is dignified together with All others and Life itself. To walk the path of compassion, not in the sorrow of guilt but in the pride of being. To take responsability for one’s mistakes and sufferings and stand up again and again like a hero and a heroine and face the struggle that is put at one’s feet and in one’s hands. Millions of people, millions and millions of people might take many generations to realize the consciousness of our humaneness but there is no other dignified path for the human being.

The “work” as I conceive it is psychological and political. Psychology is the connection between the different dimensions within one’s self and Politics is the actualization of that consciousness in our practical lives. Religion is the ceremony that binds the connectedness between the individual and the Universe. The separation between religion, politics and science, the arts and sports is, in the sphere of the social, the reflection of the schizophrenia within the individual and the masses. The dialogue between individuality and the "human" belongs to consciousness. The tendency to develop cults resides in the shortcomings we’are finding in life as it is structured today. “Life” has become the private property of a few priviledged who cannot profit from it because as soon as it is appropriated it stops to be “life” or “life-giving”.

We are all the victims of our own invention and each one is called upon to find solutions. The only problem is believing our selves incapable of finding them. We are now free to use all Systems of knowledge objectively, sharing them without imposing our will on each other. To become objective about our lives means to understand that the institutions that govern its experience are critically important. That we are one with the governments, one with the religious activities that mark its pace, that the arena’s in which we move our bodies and the laboratories in which we explore our possibilities are ALL part and parcel of our own personal responsibility. That WE ARE ONE WITH EACH OTHER AND EVERYTHING AROUND US and acknowledge for ourselves a bond of love in conscious responsibility. That we human beings know ourselves part of each other and are willing and able to act on our behalf for the benefit of each and every individual. That we no longer allow governments, industries, universities or any other institution to run along unchecked by the objective principles of humaneness. That we do not allow gurus to abuse their power or governors to steal the taxes and use them to their personal advantage in detriment of the whole. That we do not allow abuse from anyone anywhere because life is too beautiful to do so and that we are willing to stop the rampant crime with the necessary compassion Conscious knowledge is every individual's right. Conscious action is every individual's duty.

Blog Archive

Wednesday 14 April 2010

Ton

17. ton - April 14, 2010 [Edit]
e: “Just like you did in the Fellowship? People who you supposedly care for get banned and abused and you don’t even have time to look at why or protest it when you don’t agree with it? or are you going to reveal your real position and just admit what you’re doing? Playing THAT role?”

as for what i “did in the Fellowship” you have no idea what you’re talking about elena, this is where you get yourself into trouble over and over again elena, you speak of which you know not and when someone points it out, you are offended and “hurt” by the “abuse” and then you invariably lose your temper. you don’t have enough humility or the common sense to acknowledge your own culpability, you are never wrong elena, it’s always the other party who is to blame…

e: “Of course you won’t be coming here, you only go to places where you can spout at people and not actually consider anytyhing they are saying, where you can take them on in their personality and not address a word that is said about anything else, do you realize how much you are acting like Greg?”

i am here now elena, and i have been here for several days, and the whole time you refuse to acknowledge that fact, it is in fact you who does not consider anything that i’m saying, and do you know why that is ? because you are always right elena, and anyone who disagrees with you is dismissed… am i not PAINSTAKINGLY addressing EVERY WORD you are writing? i’ve responded to you line by line and yet you continue to deny the fact.

and “speaking” of greg, i’ve been thinking all along how much YOU sound like him but i haven’t mentioned it earlier because i didn’t want to offend or insult you… but since you bring it up: you are both patronizingly arrogant, bombastic, closed-minded know-it-alls and when anyone has the “audacity” to question your imaginary authority, you both invariably and therefore predictably, flip your wigs… who else has been banned from the fofblog elena? let me see, there’s you and there’s greg… why do you suppose that is? each of you are a legend in your own mind… why don’t you go spend some time on his site? you two have so much in common after all.

e: “Yes, you’ll see the book one day and you’ll think, why was I never willing to take this woman on in her exploration when I myself said to her that at the beginning people fight ideas, then they tolerate them and finally end up practicing them without even knowing where they came from.”

i sincerely hope i will see your imaginary book someday… but don’t pretend to know or to tell me now what i’ll think about anything! that’s just more of your arrogance… and don’t imagine that i will “tolerate” or follow or that i will be practicing anything based on what you preach…. you really give yourself way too much credit elena.

e: “Why should I be better than I am?”

you are absolutely right elena, you are “perfect” as you are.

e: “What matters is not how good or bad I am but how good or wrong what I am saying is and that is what people in good faith are willing to address, improve, turn over and discuss for the sake of culture.”

you are absolutely right again elena; so why is it that you lose your mind whenever someone does not agree with you or doesn’t give you the continuous and constant praise, adulation and applause which you so desperately crave ?

e: “That is what you are denying us and what was denied to us by my banning. It is exactly the same behavior Robert practices: NO DIALOGUE because no one is good enough.”

YOU got YOURSELF banned elena… wake up and take responsibility for your actions!

e: “Here again you are saying I am not good enough for you to even address what is being said. The dictator is inside of each one of us Ton and if we’re not willing to address it life will continue to be in the power of people who practice fascism everyday of their lives. Why do you like that role?”

dear elena, i’ve asked you before but you have still not shown me where it is that i write: “YOU are not good enough…”

apparently you don’t really know the true meaning of the word “fascism” – you are just tossing around another “slogan” – based on another “ism” that you’ve latched onto. again, you would do well not to speak of which you know not.
Posted by at
Labels:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)