232. Elena - November 13, 2009 [Edit]DC is having a ball in the fofblog. They only “react” to him without a clarity of their own letting him be the first force and the dominant force which makes them subject to his rule. It is wonderful that he’s been able to speak because people will understand how it happened. How it worked. How Girard got away with his cult.
I’m looking for posts in which I ask him questions that he never answered. Girard’s position in the cult was exceptional because as the second to be conscious being in the world, he was given freedom to ACT and speak. His position has to be in every way different to all other members. He talks from him self no matter how much that self corrupted the System to accomodate the cult.
These things have to be taken into consideration for they make a huge difference. Members who’ve participated on the blog cannot speak like Daily Cardiac. They never did because they never had to build up a dogma like Girard had in which he could justify everything for himself as much as everybody else who he submitted into obedience to Robert. There are thirty five years of experience in those words and that is not to be taken lightly. And still, after saying all that, Daily Cardiac could not be Girard but any of the men or women in the Fellowship that followed his footsteps closely. The few with ambitions copied him so faithfully that it would be difficult to distinguish one thought from another for the thoughts are the same even if the individual is different. The thoughts are the dogma that they all adhered to. And yet, few could wave these tides like Girard. He is a master at it and it is good to see him talking about it because he is justifying how he reached the point he reached both for himself and us. The fact that he needs to justify himself is positive. There are doubts in there. The fact that he simply avoids real questions and fall back into the same division of spiritual-practical life and adjusts practical life to examples that justify life in the inner circle shows how desperate he is to keep justifying his own actions. The examples he gives on Harvard University, sex in airplanes and such things are revealing of his own perceptions in life which are similar to examples I would hear Girard give in our conversations. But the fact that he is continuing to talk is better than anything else because it shows the extent to which he sincerely succumbed to the cult and his role and how there is no evil intent in it, like in the GOOD film that Anna just mentioned. All these people and us fell in the trap of the cult without knowing exactly how or why. That doesn’t free them or us from responsibility or make the cult any less dangerous.
These things have to be taken into consideration for they make a huge difference. Members who’ve participated on the blog cannot speak like Daily Cardiac. They never did because they never had to build up a dogma like Girard had in which he could justify everything for himself as much as everybody else who he submitted into obedience to Robert. There are thirty five years of experience in those words and that is not to be taken lightly. And still, after saying all that, Daily Cardiac could not be Girard but any of the men or women in the Fellowship that followed his footsteps closely. The few with ambitions copied him so faithfully that it would be difficult to distinguish one thought from another for the thoughts are the same even if the individual is different. The thoughts are the dogma that they all adhered to. And yet, few could wave these tides like Girard. He is a master at it and it is good to see him talking about it because he is justifying how he reached the point he reached both for himself and us. The fact that he needs to justify himself is positive. There are doubts in there. The fact that he simply avoids real questions and fall back into the same division of spiritual-practical life and adjusts practical life to examples that justify life in the inner circle shows how desperate he is to keep justifying his own actions. The examples he gives on Harvard University, sex in airplanes and such things are revealing of his own perceptions in life which are similar to examples I would hear Girard give in our conversations. But the fact that he is continuing to talk is better than anything else because it shows the extent to which he sincerely succumbed to the cult and his role and how there is no evil intent in it, like in the GOOD film that Anna just mentioned. All these people and us fell in the trap of the cult without knowing exactly how or why. That doesn’t free them or us from responsibility or make the cult any less dangerous.
No comments:
Post a Comment