The Separation between State and Religion

In time we will realize that Democracy is the entitlement of individuals to every right that was in its times alloted to kings. The right to speak and decide, to be treated with decency, to serve and be served by people in a State of “love” that is, to serve with one’s work for the development of ‘life’. To belong to the Kingdom of Human Beings without racial, national, social or academic separations. To love and be loved. To die at the service of the whole and be honored in one’s death, for one’s life and work was legitimately valued. To be graceful and grateful. To have the pride and the humility of being One with the Universe, One with every realm of Existence, One with every living and deceased soul. To treat with dignity and be treated with dignity for One is dignified together with All others and Life itself. To walk the path of compassion, not in the sorrow of guilt but in the pride of being. To take responsability for one’s mistakes and sufferings and stand up again and again like a hero and a heroine and face the struggle that is put at one’s feet and in one’s hands. Millions of people, millions and millions of people might take many generations to realize the consciousness of our humaneness but there is no other dignified path for the human being.

The “work” as I conceive it is psychological and political. Psychology is the connection between the different dimensions within one’s self and Politics is the actualization of that consciousness in our practical lives. Religion is the ceremony that binds the connectedness between the individual and the Universe. The separation between religion, politics and science, the arts and sports is, in the sphere of the social, the reflection of the schizophrenia within the individual and the masses. The dialogue between individuality and the "human" belongs to consciousness. The tendency to develop cults resides in the shortcomings we’are finding in life as it is structured today. “Life” has become the private property of a few priviledged who cannot profit from it because as soon as it is appropriated it stops to be “life” or “life-giving”.

We are all the victims of our own invention and each one is called upon to find solutions. The only problem is believing our selves incapable of finding them. We are now free to use all Systems of knowledge objectively, sharing them without imposing our will on each other. To become objective about our lives means to understand that the institutions that govern its experience are critically important. That we are one with the governments, one with the religious activities that mark its pace, that the arena’s in which we move our bodies and the laboratories in which we explore our possibilities are ALL part and parcel of our own personal responsibility. That WE ARE ONE WITH EACH OTHER AND EVERYTHING AROUND US and acknowledge for ourselves a bond of love in conscious responsibility. That we human beings know ourselves part of each other and are willing and able to act on our behalf for the benefit of each and every individual. That we no longer allow governments, industries, universities or any other institution to run along unchecked by the objective principles of humaneness. That we do not allow gurus to abuse their power or governors to steal the taxes and use them to their personal advantage in detriment of the whole. That we do not allow abuse from anyone anywhere because life is too beautiful to do so and that we are willing to stop the rampant crime with the necessary compassion Conscious knowledge is every individual's right. Conscious action is every individual's duty.

Blog Archive

Tuesday 18 October 2011

Children in the USA


Every five hours a child dies from abuse or neglect in the US. (photo: file)
Every five hours a child dies from abuse or neglect in the US. (photo: file)


FOCUS: America's Child Death Shame

By Michael Petit, BBC News
18 October 11

The BBC's full investigative series - America's Child Death Shame - is available online here. -- JPS/RSN

Why is the problem of violence against children so much more acute in the US than anywhere else in the industrialized world, asks Michael Petit, President of Every Child Matters.

ver the past 10 years, more than 20,000 American children are believed to have been killed in their own homes by family members. That is nearly four times the number of US soldiers killed in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The child maltreatment death rate in the US is triple Canada's and 11 times that of Italy. Millions of children are reported as abused and neglected every year. Why is that?
Downward Spiral
Part of the answer is that teen pregnancy, high-school dropout, violent crime, imprisonment, and poverty - factors associated with abuse and neglect - are generally much higher in the US.
Further, other rich nations have social policies that provide child care, universal health insurance, pre-school, parental leave and visiting nurses to virtually all in need.
In the US, when children are born into young families not prepared to receive them, local social safety nets may be frayed, or non-existent. As a result, they are unable to compensate for the household stress the child must endure.
In the most severe situations, there is a predictable downward spiral and a child dies. Some 75% of these children are under four, while nearly half are under one.
Geography matters a lot in determining child well-being. Take the examples of Texas and Vermont.
Texas prides itself in being a low tax, low service state. Its per capita income places it in the middle of the states, while its total tax burden - its willingness to tax itself - is near the bottom.
Vermont, in contrast, is at the other extreme. It is a high-tax, high-service state.
Mix of Risks
In looking at key indicators of well-being, children from Texas are twice as likely to drop out of high school as children from Vermont. They are four times more likely to be uninsured, four times more likely to be incarcerated, and nearly twice as likely to die from abuse and neglect.
In Texas, a combination of elements add to the mix of risks that a child faces. These include a higher poverty rate in Texas, higher proportions of minority children, lower levels of educational attainment, and a political culture which holds a narrower view of the role of government in addressing social issues.
Texas, like many other traditionally conservative states, is likely to have a weaker response to families that need help in the first place, and be less efficient in protecting children after abuse occurs.
The sharp differences between the states raises the question of an expanded federal role.
Are children Texas children first? Or are they first American children with equal opportunity and protection?
Blame Parents?
A national strategy, led by our national government, needs to be developed and implemented. For a start, the Congress should adopt legislation that would create a National Commission to End Child Abuse and Neglect Fatalities.
And no children's programmes should be on the chopping block, federal or state. Children did not crash the US economy. It is both shortsighted economic policy and morally wrong to make them pay the price for fixing it.
But instead as the US economy lags, child poverty soars, and states cut billions in children's services, we are further straining America's already weak safety net.
Inevitably, it means more children will die. The easy answer is to blame parents and already burdened child protection workers. But easy answers don't solve complex problems.
And with millions of children injured and thousands killed, this problem is large indeed, and it deserves a large response.

Michael Petit is the president of Every Child Matters. He served as the state of Maine's human services commissioner, and as deputy of the Child Welfare League of America.
 

Comments  

 
+5 # fredboy 2011-10-18 14:27
Republicans and tea baggers only care about kids born with silver spoons in their mouths. One Tennessee Republican once told me he thinks every child on welfare should be born in prison--that's how mean these bastards think.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+5 # Carolyn 2011-10-18 14:47
The difference in values noted here, between Texas and Vermont, is shocking. Out of these difficult times of climate change and culture change, surely, the consciousness level of humanity, if we are to survive, must evolve beyond the rational mind to include empathy, compassion for one another. action undertaken for the good of the whole of life on earth
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+4 # Regina 2011-10-18 14:53
This contrast highlights the dreadful fact that the U.S. as a society does not value life or children or families. The great American outcry for a Right to Life does not really serve the living, at any age. The American prevailing viewpoint doesn't even protect fetuses when their mothers are starving. We have devolved into a jungle. Our response to need is now the Tea Party's "Yeah!" for the question of letting an uninsured injury victim die in event of insufficient funds for medical care.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # readerz 2011-10-18 15:51
If the Tea Party cheers when an uninsured injury victim dies, and cheers when a pregnant woman bleeds to death killing the baby as well, then they certainly are Nazis. The trouble is, most of them have the words "Nazi" and "racist" backwards. But watch out, the U.S. Constitution has no victims' rights; next thing they'll try concentration camps.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # jon 2011-10-18 17:55
And the concentration camp will be called, "Camp Reagan".
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # Vardoz 2011-10-18 14:59
This is I believe is the horrible consequences of poverty and economic stress. The ripple affect of irresponsible legislation has impacted on millions of Americans is ignored by the money grubbing, ruthless environment that people are facing and has been created by a government that has cut Main St loose. People are trying to put food on their tables, afford clothes, medical care, housing, gas, utilities in an unstable, unsupportive economic environment. Also the family has broken down so much and millions are single parents trying to survive with few resources. Millions of people in jail, a proliferation of guns in all over the nation and millions living in dire poverty. There we no longer a sense of WE in our nation. We have become a sick society.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # colmo04 2011-10-18 15:10
And I bet the child by parents death rate is very sigificantly lower in much-malighed Mexico: people here treasure their kids. Family is LIFE. I bet also the stress level is very much lower in Mexico (and Canada, and Italy) than in the US, in spite of poverty-- also they have a much tinier percentage of their populations incarcerated because they can't cope with the strains of living in the US cutlure. Of course there is a correlation. There are more angry, frustrated, stressed people in the US than anywhere. I don't have a solution. Religion doesn't help. I won't make any friends here but I would bet the abuse occurs more frequently and seriously in in families that would describe them selves as "religious" than in those who would not. Thank you for your work on this most terrible problem. The comparative statistics are quite sobering and shocking.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # DLT888 2011-10-18 16:07
Quoting
And I bet the child by parents death rate is very sigificantly lower in much-malighed Mexico: people here treasure their kids. Family is LIFE. I bet also the stress level is very much lower in Mexico (and Canada, and Italy) than in the US, in spite of poverty-- also they have a much tinier percentage of their populations incarcerated because they can't cope with the strains of living in the US cutlure. Of course there is a correlation. There are more angry, frustrated, stressed people in the US than anywhere. I don't have a solution. Religion doesn't help. I won't make any friends here but I would bet the abuse occurs more frequently and seriously in in families that would describe them selves as "religious" than in those who would not. Thank you for your work on this most terrible problem. The comparative statistics are quite sobering and shocking.


You might be right about that. I have noticed young girls from Mexico having babies at the age of 15. THe girl's family welcomes the baby with open arms and much love. In the American culture, in my life, I would have been thrown out of my house if I got pregnant at 15 and my parents would not have seen that child as their grandchild. So I see what you mean.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # reiverpacific 2011-10-18 15:29
I already posted this from the BBC website on RSN a couple of days ago with appropriate reference thread.
This, if nothing else, is a screaming indictment for single-payer health care (including mental vision and dental). Couple it with between 39th and 42nd in quality of life indicators including infant mortality and you have (or should have) all that is required to FORCE The "Fragmented States" to catch up, as in so many other areas but I'll bet that this leader (on the BBC) never even reaches the US owner-media, or if so, is relegated to a page somewhere beside the auto sales columns.
When I brought my new daughter from Indonesia to Scotland, a nurse was provided who came to the house once a week for the first three months per the national "Well baby" program + a free consignment of milk each week thrown in -and we didn't even apply for it!
Apparently "American Exceptionalism" includes, or should I say "EXCLUDES" it's own citizens!
So much for the land of Family values and "Pro-lifers": seemingly, when a fetus becomes a breathing being ex-womb, it's on it's own before it even has bootstraps to pull itself up by, except for those who can fit into the, as Billie Holliday sang "God Bless the Child Who's Got His Own" category.
Or, as Bob Dylan once wrote "The Pump Don't Work 'Cause The Vandals Took the Handles!"
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # readerz 2011-10-18 15:46
This is a personal issue for me. My husband and I tried very hard, when our daughter was growing up, to provide a loving home. We were in New York City then, and didn't have much left after rent and food. We spoke to our daughter and played with her all the time, and took her to museums (low-cost because they only asked for free-will donations then). But she had a learning disability, and we fought with the city for years for services (dyslexia was a word they would not use because of a court case NY state lost). We paid for any services we could afford, but we could not afford daily tutors, psychiatrist, etc. The city forced our daughter to have a head to foot naked examination at a hospital to prove we were not abusing her, and both she and we were traumatized by the experience. It was amazing the lengths the city would go to try to prevent parents from asking for services, but children that had obvious bruises whose families did not ask for services were ignored. And in the summer, the kids often didn't eat much. We moved away from NYC, but found that things were similar elsewhere. America is united in one respect: a horrible attitude against both children and parents. Anybody who can get involved volunteering, if there is proper supervision, should do it; the kids and parents need the help.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Carolyn 2011-10-18 16:37
Thank you, readerz for your courage and humility in telling your story. I am so sorry for the suffering you as a family have endured.
America is beyond ready for a wake-up call.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Magars 2011-10-18 16:43
All the factors have an terrible impact in our children lifes. Some time a lot of cases are in the complicated judicial system for years, while the abused children suffer the delay. Children service departments nation wide don't have the necessary resources to resolve most of the serious cases. Social workers in schools are trying to resolve some situations with charities offered by churches and other org.to provide food, clothes, and gifts for holidays, but I believe these are only bandages for the big wounds. Children from low income families, that coincidental in some cases, are neglected, attend to school in bad shape, showing poor or none personal hygiene, but there is not accountability for the parents established by schools policies in conjunction with other federal or state institutions. A neglet child often suffers for low self-esteem that most of the time affect the learning process. The same way that our country has a huge Pentagon and an immense Homeland Security, the Nation needs a very strong infrastructure to provide our children with resources for a decent and happy life, but in the meantime, we need to demand the cease of corporate and government corruption. Yes, it is complicated, but it is time to do the right thing now so the society
does not have to punish more adults in the future.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # DaveM 2011-10-18 16:56
Readerz points out a major problem with the "safety net" for children. Child protection workers justify their jobs by case load, not by the legitimacy of same. So, they will hound the victim of a false accusation or a "troublemaker" literally to death if necessary, while ignoring obvious signs of child abuse/neglect despite repeated reports.

Why is this? Probably because law-abiding people will comply, at least up to the point where they realize what they have gotten into. Those who are engaging in criminal behavior will not, which make for more work that social workers do not want to do, and the possibility of confrontation. Whether you abuse your child or not has little to do with whether you will end up dealing with Child Protection Services. Whether you rub someone the wrong way at your kid's school or whether you will "cooperate" is a far great factor.

You know whether you are treating your children properly or not (unless you are psychotic or a fundamentalist) . If a social worker tries to tell you differently, fight back from the first word, and eventually you'll be left alone. The bozo down the street who beats his kid is doing just that, and no one will ever stop him.

No comments:

Post a Comment