The Separation between State and Religion

In time we will realize that Democracy is the entitlement of individuals to every right that was in its times alloted to kings. The right to speak and decide, to be treated with decency, to serve and be served by people in a State of “love” that is, to serve with one’s work for the development of ‘life’. To belong to the Kingdom of Human Beings without racial, national, social or academic separations. To love and be loved. To die at the service of the whole and be honored in one’s death, for one’s life and work was legitimately valued. To be graceful and grateful. To have the pride and the humility of being One with the Universe, One with every realm of Existence, One with every living and deceased soul. To treat with dignity and be treated with dignity for One is dignified together with All others and Life itself. To walk the path of compassion, not in the sorrow of guilt but in the pride of being. To take responsability for one’s mistakes and sufferings and stand up again and again like a hero and a heroine and face the struggle that is put at one’s feet and in one’s hands. Millions of people, millions and millions of people might take many generations to realize the consciousness of our humaneness but there is no other dignified path for the human being.

The “work” as I conceive it is psychological and political. Psychology is the connection between the different dimensions within one’s self and Politics is the actualization of that consciousness in our practical lives. Religion is the ceremony that binds the connectedness between the individual and the Universe. The separation between religion, politics and science, the arts and sports is, in the sphere of the social, the reflection of the schizophrenia within the individual and the masses. The dialogue between individuality and the "human" belongs to consciousness. The tendency to develop cults resides in the shortcomings we’are finding in life as it is structured today. “Life” has become the private property of a few priviledged who cannot profit from it because as soon as it is appropriated it stops to be “life” or “life-giving”.

We are all the victims of our own invention and each one is called upon to find solutions. The only problem is believing our selves incapable of finding them. We are now free to use all Systems of knowledge objectively, sharing them without imposing our will on each other. To become objective about our lives means to understand that the institutions that govern its experience are critically important. That we are one with the governments, one with the religious activities that mark its pace, that the arena’s in which we move our bodies and the laboratories in which we explore our possibilities are ALL part and parcel of our own personal responsibility. That WE ARE ONE WITH EACH OTHER AND EVERYTHING AROUND US and acknowledge for ourselves a bond of love in conscious responsibility. That we human beings know ourselves part of each other and are willing and able to act on our behalf for the benefit of each and every individual. That we no longer allow governments, industries, universities or any other institution to run along unchecked by the objective principles of humaneness. That we do not allow gurus to abuse their power or governors to steal the taxes and use them to their personal advantage in detriment of the whole. That we do not allow abuse from anyone anywhere because life is too beautiful to do so and that we are willing to stop the rampant crime with the necessary compassion Conscious knowledge is every individual's right. Conscious action is every individual's duty.

Blog Archive

Thursday 18 March 2010

Elena-external looks- serial killer


75. Elena - March 17, 2010 [Edit]

The look of the guru is very interesting. I recently saw a doctor who thinks of himself as one of those with exactly the same look. That “so benign” look like they wouldn’t hurt a fly! There is also a “detachment” in it. I noticed the detachment even more in the doctor who greeted me with the superiority of a kind and benign Jesus. It’s not as if they were all there but as if they were made of fluffy cotton. As if they were trying to look like their imaginary picture of God! Which is what makes the “act” so obvious. The look is as if they were “beyond” this world with an act of “kindness” that rests solely on their much established authority but doesn’t allow actual confrontation as equals. In the act of kindness they have to re-establish their superiority act as father or godlike figures. THAT is it. That re-establishing the hierarchy of being “superior” even with kindness.
Burton has his own act and more than a fluffy god he prefers a modern Louis a la hollywood with a palm tree behind the picture! His act of kindness is not so pronounced. He keeps his boundaries well. He’s “physical” only with his boys and yes, father-like with women, then with an obviously sexual tenor. He touches them under the table while dinning but doesn’t hide it which is nice! It would be much nicer if one didn’t know all that is involved in it. He’s fairly open about it but his clear superiority is established in that the boys remain as servants in the background. The hierarchy in the relation is very obvious and he reaffirms it constantly separating them from his self and at the same time keeping them within his circle. I mean, he makes the distance obvious. The boys serve, always, there is no equality.
A couple of days ago there was a video on the news about a serial killer who’d pose as a photographer and went to one of those making couples, shows on T.V. where he was videod and then they show him when he gets caught maybe twenty five or thirty years later. What is striking is that the only thing that doesn’t change about his looks is the softness of his manners, almost feminine, like the guru in the video and the fluffy hair. In the killer the fluffy hair is fluffier than the most “trimmed” woman would carry it, almost childlike.
Posted by at
Labels:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)