The Separation between State and Religion

In time we will realize that Democracy is the entitlement of individuals to every right that was in its times alloted to kings. The right to speak and decide, to be treated with decency, to serve and be served by people in a State of “love” that is, to serve with one’s work for the development of ‘life’. To belong to the Kingdom of Human Beings without racial, national, social or academic separations. To love and be loved. To die at the service of the whole and be honored in one’s death, for one’s life and work was legitimately valued. To be graceful and grateful. To have the pride and the humility of being One with the Universe, One with every realm of Existence, One with every living and deceased soul. To treat with dignity and be treated with dignity for One is dignified together with All others and Life itself. To walk the path of compassion, not in the sorrow of guilt but in the pride of being. To take responsability for one’s mistakes and sufferings and stand up again and again like a hero and a heroine and face the struggle that is put at one’s feet and in one’s hands. Millions of people, millions and millions of people might take many generations to realize the consciousness of our humaneness but there is no other dignified path for the human being.

The “work” as I conceive it is psychological and political. Psychology is the connection between the different dimensions within one’s self and Politics is the actualization of that consciousness in our practical lives. Religion is the ceremony that binds the connectedness between the individual and the Universe. The separation between religion, politics and science, the arts and sports is, in the sphere of the social, the reflection of the schizophrenia within the individual and the masses. The dialogue between individuality and the "human" belongs to consciousness. The tendency to develop cults resides in the shortcomings we’are finding in life as it is structured today. “Life” has become the private property of a few priviledged who cannot profit from it because as soon as it is appropriated it stops to be “life” or “life-giving”.

We are all the victims of our own invention and each one is called upon to find solutions. The only problem is believing our selves incapable of finding them. We are now free to use all Systems of knowledge objectively, sharing them without imposing our will on each other. To become objective about our lives means to understand that the institutions that govern its experience are critically important. That we are one with the governments, one with the religious activities that mark its pace, that the arena’s in which we move our bodies and the laboratories in which we explore our possibilities are ALL part and parcel of our own personal responsibility. That WE ARE ONE WITH EACH OTHER AND EVERYTHING AROUND US and acknowledge for ourselves a bond of love in conscious responsibility. That we human beings know ourselves part of each other and are willing and able to act on our behalf for the benefit of each and every individual. That we no longer allow governments, industries, universities or any other institution to run along unchecked by the objective principles of humaneness. That we do not allow gurus to abuse their power or governors to steal the taxes and use them to their personal advantage in detriment of the whole. That we do not allow abuse from anyone anywhere because life is too beautiful to do so and that we are willing to stop the rampant crime with the necessary compassion Conscious knowledge is every individual's right. Conscious action is every individual's duty.

Friday 1 April 2011

Why Americans Are Fed Lies


Why Americans Are Fed Lies

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog
31 March 11

The Truth About the Economy That Nobody In Washington or On Wall Street Will Admit: We're Heading Back Toward a Double Dip
hy aren't Americans being told the truth about the economy? We're heading in the direction of a double dip - but you'd never know it if you listened to the upbeat messages coming out of Wall Street and Washington.
Consumers are 70 percent of the American economy, and consumer confidence is plummeting. It's weaker today on average than at the lowest point of the Great Recession.
The Reuters/University of Michigan survey shows a 10 point decline in March - the tenth largest drop on record. Part of that drop is attributable to rising fuel and food prices. A separate Conference Board's index of consumer confidence, just released, shows consumer confidence at a five-month low - and a large part is due to expectations of fewer jobs and lower wages in the months ahead.
Pessimistic consumers buy less. And fewer sales spells economic trouble ahead.
What about the 192,000 jobs added in February? (We'll know more Friday about how many jobs were added in March.) It's peanuts compared to what's needed. Remember, 125,000 new jobs are necessary just to keep up with a growing number of Americans eligible for employment. And the nation has lost so many jobs over the last three years that even at a rate of 200,000 a month we wouldn't get back to 6 percent unemployment until 2016.
But isn't the economy growing again - by an estimated 2.5 to 2.9 percent this year? Yes, but that's even less than peanuts. The deeper the economic hole, the faster the growth needed to get back on track. By this point in the so-called recovery we'd expect growth of 4 to 6 percent.
Consider that back in 1934, when it was emerging from the deepest hole of the Great Depression, the economy grew 7.7 percent. The next year it grew over 8 percent. In 1936 it grew a whopping 14.1 percent.
Add two other ominous signs: Real hourly wages continue to fall, and housing prices continue to drop. Hourly wages are falling because with unemployment so high, most people have no bargaining power and will take whatever they can get. Housing is dropping because of the ever-larger number of homes people have walked away from because they can't pay their mortgages. But because homes the biggest asset most Americans own, as home prices drop most Americans feel even poorer.
There's no possibility government will make up for the coming shortfall in consumer spending. To the contrary, government is worsening the situation. State and local governments are slashing their budgets by roughly $110 billion this year. The federal stimulus is ending, and the federal government will end up cutting some $30 billion from this year's budget.
In other words: Watch out. We may avoid a double dip but the economy is slowing ominously, and the booster rockets are disappearing.
So why aren't we getting the truth about the economy? For one thing, Wall Street is buoyant - and most financial news you hear comes from the Street. Wall Street profits soared to $426.5 billion last quarter, according to the Commerce Department. (That gain more than offset a drop in the profits of non-financial domestic companies.) Anyone who believes the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill put a stop to the Street's creativity hasn't been watching.
To the extent non-financial companies are doing well, they're making most of their money abroad. Since 1992, for example, GE's offshore profits have risen $92 billion, from $15 billion (which is one reason it pays no US taxes). In fact, the only group that's optimistic about the future are CEOs of big American companies. The Business Roundtable's economic outlook index, which surveys 142 CEOs, is now at its highest point since it began in 2002.
Washington, meanwhile, doesn't want to sound the economic alarm. The White House and most Democrats want Americans to believe the economy is on an upswing.
Republicans, for their part, worry that if they tell it like it is Americans will want government to do more rather than less. They'd rather not talk about jobs and wages, and put the focus instead on deficit reduction (or spread the lie that by reducing the deficit we'll get more jobs and higher wages).
I'm sorry to have to deliver the bad news, but it's better you know.

Robert Reich is Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written thirteen books, including "The Work of Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet," "Supercapitalism" and his latest book, "AFTERSHOCK: The Next Economy and America's Future." His 'Marketplace' commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.
 

Comments  

 
+50# JahLove63 2011-03-31 18:04
You're right. It indeed has gotten better for Wall Street with all these American (MultiNational) Corporations making record profits. None of this is a surprise to me...I've been insanely advocating, on deaf ears, of course, that Bush Srs. New World order dream of globalization will be the end of democracy and capitalism as we know it! The world I was born into 48 years ago is not the same world I live in today. I see our once great stature eroding, being morphed into an aristocratic fascist system governed by a shadow Corporacracy.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+3# DaveW 2011-04-01 08:14
JahLove63, I agree with everything you say but would have added Bill Clinton to the toxix stew. His NAFTA signing and capitulation on financial deregulation is highly significant in understanding how we got where we are. Reich states, "Hourly wages are falling because with unemployment so high, people have no bargaining power and will take whatever they can get." THIS is why the Republicans and Blue Dog Democratic allies have focused on the curtailment of women's reproductive rights INSTEAD of job promoting programs. Emma Goldman, a woman's rights activist and anarchist in the early part of the twentieth century talked of the "worker bees." Women used primarily as "incubators of industry" spitting out one child after another, doomed to poor educational opportunities and forced either to enlist in the military, work menial, low wage jobs, or, if female, prepare to produce more fodder for the elites to use at their discretion. God Bless America my ass! JahLove63, we need to hear some Jimmy Cliff again, "Sufferin' in the Land."
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+46# Kayjay 2011-03-31 20:02
Hey, here's an idea. How about we spend less moola on fighting three wars, and use this money to fund another economic stimulus package. The first stimulus was more or less a small gesture taken by Washington politicos who held our hands and patted our heads, saying everything would be alright. Its beyond time for more of us to MARCH, and get as passionate/involved in order to take back our nation. For future generations, save both our trees and a semblance of democracy. Find a way to clean house in 2012.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+11# sark 2011-04-01 03:54
Fantastic ideas but I think the only way we will ever have real change is taking back the elections and making sure our votes are counted as cast. We can MARCH, call, write and protest but as long as the vote count is done on machines manufactured and serviced by hard right wing supporting corporations, we will continue on this path of corporate rule. To truly clean house and make sure we don't just have the illusion of an occasional victory, we must address election integrity and the machines that count the vote.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+6# GWC 2011-03-31 23:44
After reading all about our economy and how to save America from sure destruction, I'm ready to start a new party where conventions are not needed nor allowed. Use this money for research on alternate forms of energy for fuel to get goods to consumers. Elections will be government funded. Term limits for all federal elected positions. Stop making weapons for wars that cannot be won. Make health care available for everyone for free (yes, free!). Use a consumption tax so every one, corporations included, pays their share of running the country. Greatly reduce the number of people who are armed and trained to fight - including local police, homeland security "employees". The TSA, CIA special ops personnel, the DEA people who are fighting the "war" on drugs. Focus on treatment not "enforcement" with those who use drugs (legal and "illegal". Change the focus of our police to keeping the peace vs. "enforcing the law!" Make higher education the number 1 item on our "must do" list, and make it free. Take a serious look at what we are doing to our environment. End for-profit outsourcing of government services. One last thought (for now at least) make every program be what the people want, not what the wealthy want. To accomplish these programs we must take time out and ask God for His assistance, for He is the one who makes things happen.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+5# LiberalLibertarian 2011-04-01 05:22
In concept, I agree.

First, drop the God stuff. It is unconstitutiona l, and reeks of trouble bigger than any that you may sove.

The rest of your details, I would hope can be negotiated. Some are great, others such as a consumption tax and term limits are not my preference.
In general, we do have to something beyond talking to ourselves.

We need real fundamental, soul searching change.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+8# Dave45 2011-03-31 23:46
I think Robert Reich is running for president. If not, he should be.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+3# LiberalLibertarian 2011-04-01 05:45
I agree.

But, unfortanetly he cannot win. He is too short and too Jewish.

In that great Communist stronghold (sic), the Commonwealth of MA, he could only muster 25% of the Democrats when he ran for Governer.

No, original thinking is not encouraged in America anymore.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+15# Patricia Chang 2011-04-01 00:44
One of the problems with the public is that they are in denial, while at the same time suffering the consequences of what they are denying. Obama and Congress encourage it. The corporate-owned media encourages it. I knew back under Clinton and NAFTA and bank de-regulation that we were headed in the wrong direction. We haven't been headed in the right direction since then. Only the Fat Cats are profiting. Wealth is in the hands of too few. The whole system is top-heavy. It is absolutely bound to collapse. "Double-Dip"?! We will be lucky if it is only at that level. I see a world wide economic collapse. It will be devastation. The wise person will start stocking up on canned goods, water, some rain barrels, a wood-burning stove, and hope for the best but expect the worst. The indicators are there. They are growing worse, not better. Obama has turned a blind eye and a deaf ear to all of it. He would sell us down the river for a bent nickel.The Republicans are as bad. Our government is corrupt and broken. There are NO solutions to our problems there. Hang on to your hats, folks. A very rough ride is ahead. Even gold will be worth little. What will there be to buy? So, the greed-driven rich, with all their offshore accounts, may not be nearly as safe as they, in their profound arrogance, think they are.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+5# James R Young 2011-04-01 06:01
You are right about the denial. David Brooks, in his ted.com talk, points out 19% of Americans think they are in the top 1% of earners. See http://www.ted.com/talks/david_brooks_the_social_animal.html (about 20 minutes into it).
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-5# rf 2011-04-01 03:34
I think Obama is right on schedule...wouldn't want a recovery until it can propel him into office in 2012! Maybe he IS a smart president and not just a bad bargainer. Too bad he is taking it out of OUR middle class (or used to be) skins.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2# LiberalLibertarian 2011-04-01 06:31
You really think Obama has that much power?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-3# futhark 2011-04-01 03:36
Oust the Liar-in-Chief in 2012. Maybe the Democratic Party will get the message that they need to present some substantive alternative policies for America, instead of merely acting as lying toadies for the Plutocrats.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+6# LiberalLibertarian 2011-04-01 06:35
Change will come from the bottom. The people. We need alternatives to the Blue Dog Democrats.

We need an active Progressive Democrat party. We will support Progressive Democrats and recruit viable candidates to replace those that are not progressive.

We need leadership for this movement.

I am sick of talking, lets do it!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+5# Dave Stone 2011-04-01 04:11
For the real reason the country's broke, see this short video by Ben Cohen of Ben and Jerry's Icecream:

http://www.truemajority.org/oreos
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+15# LiberalLibertarian 2011-04-01 04:36
For some crazy reason the administration truly believes that the American people think that cutting the budget is more important than creating jobs. When the "private" economy is not creating jobs, it is the "public sector's" responsibility to do so.

It funds that job creation by absorbing the excess income that is not being used to grow the economy. In other words, tax the rich.

This is not complicated. Only stupid Republicans have not figured it out.

Professor Reich, we are not being told the truth, because the government is split between 3 factions. 1) Stupid Republicans 2)Those that think most Americans are stupid 3) Persons that want to control all wealth and power, or at least be seen as their allies.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2# Sue 2011-04-01 07:31
YES!!!! The government is the employer of last resort.

I see that we're repeating the 1937 mistake. (Did I get the date right, Professor?) Yes, the deficit spending seems OTT but we can't wimp out now!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+8# PGreen 2011-04-01 04:48
The one-sided class war is in full swing. We live in a system of "state capitalism," in which the economy is managed by government for the benefit of corporations. (War is largely a part of this management.) Corporations, being essentially totalitarian in structure, funnel their profits to benefit a select few (giving rise to the phrase "crony capitalism"). Thus we end up with an oligarchy comprised of business and government officials operating in tandem. Some people like to pretend that our economic system is a meritocracy, that talent dictates this distribution of wealth, but in reality talent plays only a small part. And strangely, these people often ignore that even if ability is the deciding factor, such a maldistribution of wealth guarantees hardship for most people. The public majority has said frequently that we don't want this kind of distribution, regardless of merit, but the democratic functions in our institutions are being over turned and ignored. Where will it end?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0# murielschnierow 2011-04-01 08:00
if it goes as it seems to be we will end up with a 3rd party. The President is not a disappointment to me because i met him. However He and all the others want votes lots of them and that is our power. Votes.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+8# mediasavy 2011-04-01 05:07
I'm sorry, but we need another candidate for President in 2012. I'm completely fed up with Obama and his gang of corporate bagmen and banker's boys. This gang is not going to get past the Republicans in the next election. 

We voted in 2008 for the party of Roosevelt and the memories of MLK and JFK and we got the party of Coolidge instead. Be it war, the economy, education or energy policy there is absolutely nothing this administration had done or ignored that I can support or agree with. 

They are presiding over and facilitating the economic destruction of more than half this country's population. Far from even illuminating the damage done to our lives, the Obama administration is paving our crises over for the benefit of their corporate campaign contributors. 

Enough is enough! If they won't defend our interests, we need new leaders!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0# murielschnierow 2011-04-01 08:03
We are not broke.Control this false GOP and get out of war ($120 bil yr), tax earners $1 mil yr ( $800 bil Yr), and shut the tax havens - How ? votes.Total probably $400 bil Yr.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+6# Merschrod 2011-04-01 05:12
Even if the consumer were to "activate" most would be spent on imported projects and thus would not generate jobs. It is glum.

The separation of the financial opinion from the US manufacturing opinion is an important gauge.

I think that statistics by sector on hiring would be useful at this poit to see where gains really are and are not.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+5# mediasavy 2011-04-01 05:36
We also need to look at the wages. 

Unemployment among college professors is very low (3%) but more than half are now adjuncts, making - on average - less than 20,000 a year, no benefits and, in many places, no social security payments made. 30 years ago, 7% of the faculty were adjuncts, now most college professors are adjuncts. An entire job market is being destroyed as we speak, while the cost of tuition continues to skyrocket. 

So to look at one job sector - that requires very high educational qualifications - we have low unemployment AND collapsing wages. 

I'm sure this pattern is repeated across a host of sectors, even when they are employed.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+6# in deo veritas 2011-04-01 05:47
If the TV "media" did their job instead of being run by Murdoch and his Wall Street thugs, would it make a difference? I wonder. Maybe things just aren't bad enough yet to wake people up. Maybe too many people in the country just don't give a damn or they are too self-satisfied. Regardless it comes down to the dumbing down of America. As long as we have our bread and circuses the sheeple will be just as impotent as in the Roman Empire! The parallels are too obvious for anyone whill still thinks or knows anything about history to deny any longer. Rome was saved by the"barbarians". Where are they now that we need them? The enemy is not at the gates-they own the gates!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1# Nwcitizen 2011-04-01 05:49
Professor Reich - We get that our economy is in bad shape and that public policy is wrong headed. The bigger question is what to do about it.

What say you? Of the many things that we could spend our time on, which are most important in order to right this ship?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+4# ruth mckenney 2011-04-01 05:53
the above comments are so depressing that a poor fool like me, who knows little of economics, wonders: if so many of you DO know, how often do you write, email, POUND your representatives & this President with your persuasions? Do you phonecall every day? Saying what you think on your puters is important, but doing what you think about is MORE significant All the talk will not make up for walking the walk!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+4# ruthee 2011-04-01 06:09
For some time now, I have felt Washington is another country. These comments confirm my suspicions to an alarming degree. How many of you email, snail mail, and telephone your opinions to your reps & senators in Wash?? Do you speak with others re your statements?? Or are we just a silent majority? Advertising depends on repetition and God knows, TV proves it! How strongly do we pursue our convictions? If you are so busy making your salaries and do not have time to share opines with your fellow citizens and your governors, what do you expect will hap?? Do you vote faithfully? What are so many of us DOING? TALKING HERE IS A GOOD START, but what are you doing?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2# kalpal 2011-04-01 07:03
Lies are the most prevalent comfort food in American political feasting. Without lies politics in America would grind to a halt and sink in the muck. 

I remember that Carter tried honesty and it failed miserably. 

As Nixon said to a member of his staff who wanted to run for office, "You are not a good enough liar."
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote

No comments:

Post a Comment