The Separation between State and Religion

In time we will realize that Democracy is the entitlement of individuals to every right that was in its times alloted to kings. The right to speak and decide, to be treated with decency, to serve and be served by people in a State of “love” that is, to serve with one’s work for the development of ‘life’. To belong to the Kingdom of Human Beings without racial, national, social or academic separations. To love and be loved. To die at the service of the whole and be honored in one’s death, for one’s life and work was legitimately valued. To be graceful and grateful. To have the pride and the humility of being One with the Universe, One with every realm of Existence, One with every living and deceased soul. To treat with dignity and be treated with dignity for One is dignified together with All others and Life itself. To walk the path of compassion, not in the sorrow of guilt but in the pride of being. To take responsability for one’s mistakes and sufferings and stand up again and again like a hero and a heroine and face the struggle that is put at one’s feet and in one’s hands. Millions of people, millions and millions of people might take many generations to realize the consciousness of our humaneness but there is no other dignified path for the human being.

The “work” as I conceive it is psychological and political. Psychology is the connection between the different dimensions within one’s self and Politics is the actualization of that consciousness in our practical lives. Religion is the ceremony that binds the connectedness between the individual and the Universe. The separation between religion, politics and science, the arts and sports is, in the sphere of the social, the reflection of the schizophrenia within the individual and the masses. The dialogue between individuality and the "human" belongs to consciousness. The tendency to develop cults resides in the shortcomings we’are finding in life as it is structured today. “Life” has become the private property of a few priviledged who cannot profit from it because as soon as it is appropriated it stops to be “life” or “life-giving”.

We are all the victims of our own invention and each one is called upon to find solutions. The only problem is believing our selves incapable of finding them. We are now free to use all Systems of knowledge objectively, sharing them without imposing our will on each other. To become objective about our lives means to understand that the institutions that govern its experience are critically important. That we are one with the governments, one with the religious activities that mark its pace, that the arena’s in which we move our bodies and the laboratories in which we explore our possibilities are ALL part and parcel of our own personal responsibility. That WE ARE ONE WITH EACH OTHER AND EVERYTHING AROUND US and acknowledge for ourselves a bond of love in conscious responsibility. That we human beings know ourselves part of each other and are willing and able to act on our behalf for the benefit of each and every individual. That we no longer allow governments, industries, universities or any other institution to run along unchecked by the objective principles of humaneness. That we do not allow gurus to abuse their power or governors to steal the taxes and use them to their personal advantage in detriment of the whole. That we do not allow abuse from anyone anywhere because life is too beautiful to do so and that we are willing to stop the rampant crime with the necessary compassion Conscious knowledge is every individual's right. Conscious action is every individual's duty.

Saturday 2 April 2011

Elena: Ton's motivation and consequences








You do not inspire gratitude. I wonder if they would take your license away if they realized how you are using your knowledge. Or your wife and children, I wonder what they would think if they knew what you've been doing here for over two years banging on someone with the excuse that you are helping them, like any good old fascist. Tell me Ton, what was it that hurt you so badly? That I called you sissies for allowing the cult to go on for years and years hurting people without doing anything about it? Especially those like you who were trained enough to know the damages and still never said a word to the people that were being hurt? or that I questioned the nations, the institutions and the academy, like thousands are questioning them today? Or the machism that bent to Robert's and supported it because it made you men feel so special and empowered? Or is it that I've been too right for your taste? I realize you have the motivation Ton although you hide it behind the "help dressing" but it is so obvious that even a youth could see through it. I guess you are that kind of doctor that does surgery without the patients approval but for your information, there are two problems here: one, your assessment of the malady is misconstrued to fit your agenda and two, it is against the law. You are inventing a malady and pretending to cure but hurting the patient. You might think that you are not accountable here, like the men that raped the woman in Libya thinking she was only a stupid woman in the back streets of a country in which they haven't even begun to count, only to find themselves in the eyes of the world a week later.

I am being harassed by you and do not appreciate it. You are a sick man. I hope you realize how serious I am about stopping your harassment should you not stop willingly. This is not a threat but serious warning. You are playing with fire. I have been incredibly naive thinking and wishing you to be honest and have allowed this to go on for this long but give me just one post with the same agenda and you will get banned. After all, the responsibility to protect one's self falls first and foremost on the individual. Even people who kill in self defense are not made accountable. Why would I be if I ban you? At least I learn.

We are One doesn't mean putting up with abuse but taking care of abuse so that it doesn't become an obstacle to Oneness. Nothing is more firm and serious than protecting our right to legitimate interchange against sick people like you. All law is designed to meet that end.


No comments:

Post a Comment