The Separation between State and Religion

In time we will realize that Democracy is the entitlement of individuals to every right that was in its times alloted to kings. The right to speak and decide, to be treated with decency, to serve and be served by people in a State of “love” that is, to serve with one’s work for the development of ‘life’. To belong to the Kingdom of Human Beings without racial, national, social or academic separations. To love and be loved. To die at the service of the whole and be honored in one’s death, for one’s life and work was legitimately valued. To be graceful and grateful. To have the pride and the humility of being One with the Universe, One with every realm of Existence, One with every living and deceased soul. To treat with dignity and be treated with dignity for One is dignified together with All others and Life itself. To walk the path of compassion, not in the sorrow of guilt but in the pride of being. To take responsability for one’s mistakes and sufferings and stand up again and again like a hero and a heroine and face the struggle that is put at one’s feet and in one’s hands. Millions of people, millions and millions of people might take many generations to realize the consciousness of our humaneness but there is no other dignified path for the human being.

The “work” as I conceive it is psychological and political. Psychology is the connection between the different dimensions within one’s self and Politics is the actualization of that consciousness in our practical lives. Religion is the ceremony that binds the connectedness between the individual and the Universe. The separation between religion, politics and science, the arts and sports is, in the sphere of the social, the reflection of the schizophrenia within the individual and the masses. The dialogue between individuality and the "human" belongs to consciousness. The tendency to develop cults resides in the shortcomings we’are finding in life as it is structured today. “Life” has become the private property of a few priviledged who cannot profit from it because as soon as it is appropriated it stops to be “life” or “life-giving”.

We are all the victims of our own invention and each one is called upon to find solutions. The only problem is believing our selves incapable of finding them. We are now free to use all Systems of knowledge objectively, sharing them without imposing our will on each other. To become objective about our lives means to understand that the institutions that govern its experience are critically important. That we are one with the governments, one with the religious activities that mark its pace, that the arena’s in which we move our bodies and the laboratories in which we explore our possibilities are ALL part and parcel of our own personal responsibility. That WE ARE ONE WITH EACH OTHER AND EVERYTHING AROUND US and acknowledge for ourselves a bond of love in conscious responsibility. That we human beings know ourselves part of each other and are willing and able to act on our behalf for the benefit of each and every individual. That we no longer allow governments, industries, universities or any other institution to run along unchecked by the objective principles of humaneness. That we do not allow gurus to abuse their power or governors to steal the taxes and use them to their personal advantage in detriment of the whole. That we do not allow abuse from anyone anywhere because life is too beautiful to do so and that we are willing to stop the rampant crime with the necessary compassion Conscious knowledge is every individual's right. Conscious action is every individual's duty.

Blog Archive

Monday 22 November 2010

The Spiritual Significance of ¿Plata O Plomo?

  
SMALL WARS JOURNAL 
smallwarsjournal.com 


The Spiritual Significance of ¿Plata O Plomo? 

Pamela L. Bunker and Robert J. Bunker 

Conventional wisdom holds that narco gang and drug cartel violence in Mexico is primarily 
secular in nature. This viewpoint has been recently challenged by the activities of the La Familia 
cartel and some Los Zetas, Gulfo, and other cartel adherents of the cult of Santa Muerte (Saint 
Death) by means of religious tenets of ‘divine justice’ and instances of tortured victims and ritual 
human sacrifice offered up to a dark deity, respectively.  Severed heads thrown onto a disco floor 
in Michoacan in 2005 and burnt skull imprints in a clearing in a ranch in the Yucatán Peninsula 
in 2008 only serve to highlight the number of such incidents which have now taken place. 
Whereas the infamous ‘black cauldron’ incident in Matamoros in 1989, where American college 
student Mark Kilroy’s brain was found in a ritual nganga belonging to a local narco gang, was 
the rare exception, such spiritual-like activities have now become far more frequent. 

These activities only serve to further elaborate concerns amongst scholars, including Sullivan, 
Elkus, Brands, Manwaring, and the authors, over societal warfare breaking out across the 
Americas.1 This warfare— manifesting itself in ‘criminal insurgencies’ derived from groups of 
gang, cartel, and mercenary networks— promotes new forms of state organization drawn from 
criminally based social and political norms and behaviors.  These include a value system derived 
from illicit narcotics use, killing for sport and pleasure, human trafficking and slavery, 
dysfunctional perspectives on women and family life, and a habitual orientation to violence and 
total disregard for modern civil society and democratic freedoms. This harkens back to Peter’s 
thoughts concerning the emergence of a ‘new warrior class’ and, before that, van Creveld’s ‘non- 
trinitarian warfare’ projections.

A recent insight, gained by the authors after the conclusion of a major research project on 
Mexican drug groups,3 

 is that this insurgency has at its basis a spiritual, if not religious, 
component that threatens the underlying foundations of our modern Western value system. This 
component is derived from the well known cartel technique of offering an individual ¿Plata O 
Plomo?—take our silver or we will fill you with our lead. As a tactic taken by groups with a 
theological bent, such as La Familia, this offer becomes Faustian, join us and in the process give 
up your soul or die, a choice historically associated with incidents of religious conversion at the 
tip of a sword. That technique is typically carried out by young religions, such as militant 
Christianity and Islam, during their expansionistic phases. These post-battlefield mass 
conversions are considered by the victors as actually saving the souls of those joining the 
righteous ranks of God’s chosen. A side benefit of such practices is of course to replenish the 
ranks of the fallen and to vastly increase the size of a religious movement via an ever-expanding 
holy war. Compare the size and power of Islam in the 7th century to that of the religion a couple 
of centuries later and the historical benefits of this process become readily apparent. Even 
Christianity, with Emperor Constatine’s conversion prior to the Battle of the Milvian Bridge in 
the early 4th century, has benefited from a similar process with the subsequent mass religious 
conversion of the Roman state and its legions. 
  
In the context of the Mexican cartels, and to a more limited extent the earlier Colombian ones, 
what we are now witnessing is a process in which criminal conversion by the bullet is taking 
place. This is an allied concept to that discussed by Manwaring with regard to the ‘Sullivan- 
Bunker Cocktail’ that targets state sovereignty by eating away at institutions of a state.4 
Individuals targeted by the ¿Plata O Plomo? cartel technique can either choose to embrace 
criminality by taking the bribe offered or be killed. While individuals are allowed ‘free will’ and 
can choose death with a clear conscious over that of embracing criminality, Hobbes typically has 
a clear advantage over Rosseau when the final decision is made.  Thus, in accepting the bribe, 
such individuals, while they preserve their own skins, readily compromise their values and join 
what is becoming a growing criminal insurgency in the Americas against the modern 
Westphalian state system. No moral salvation exists for those who cross the line and accept the 
silver of the narcos. Corruption taints the soul and we are increasingly finding ourselves besieged 
by growing ranks of such lost souls with their Cuerno de Chivo (Goat’s Horn— AK-47 assault 
rifle) talisman in hand. 

Yet, what is still missing in this conversion equation is a strong and overarching religious 
archetype or movement that helps to more fully unite those embracing the criminality espoused 
by the narco gangs, cartels, and their mercenary foot soldiers. La Familia adherents, while 
dramatically increasing, now only number less than ten thousand while the far more numerous 
cult of Santa Muerte, now ranging in number somewhere between  one and five million, has 
more of its followers thought to still subscribe to the older and more benign forms of that 
religious practice.  This suggests that we are nowhere near a tipping point where criminal 
conversion also corresponds to some sort of threatening or dark form of narco related religious 
conversion. What it does suggest, though, is as the ¿Plata O Plomo? conversion technique 
continues to be refined and increasingly spreads in Mexico, Central America, regions of South 
America, and penetrates over the United States border with Mexico, it prepares the ground and 
creates fertile conditions for such narco spiritual potentials. 

An example of this concern is that of a Los Zetas assassination cell composed of US teens 
working in Laredo, Texas in the 2005-2006. One of its members, hitman Gabriel Cardona, 
sported a large Santa Muerte tattoo on the back and open eye tattoos on his eyelids that have 
helped to elevate him to a ‘narco mark of the beast’ archetype. Religious shrines and altars, 
which include the burning of black candles and a few instances of blood sacrifices, have now 
also been tied to more extreme narco religious followers. 

Honest men are increasingly accepting bribes and embracing criminality over certain death, in 
some instances, along with the threat of the infliction of torture. Such is the reality of day-to-day 
life in many of the sovereign free and cartel controlled zones that now exist in Mexico and 
Central America. Who can say if those who are willing to compromise their values—and in a 
sense have already darkened their souls—are not willing to complete the transformational 
process taking place and accept criminally derived forms of spirituality and religion into their 
hearts? In the war over social and political organization now raging in the Americas, we must 
expect and prepare for these and other such contingencies. 

Pamela L. Bunker is a senior officer of the Counter-OPFOR Corporation. Research interests 
include less lethal weapons (LLW) and CONUS OPFORs (radical environmental and fringe 
groups and religious cults). Her work has been presented in policing and academic conferences 
in Alaska, Australia, and Germany. She was a contributor to the Encyclopedia of World War I 
(ABC-CLIO, 2005), has written on less lethal weapons for a NLECTC-West project, and has 
fired LLW on the South Australia Police (SAPOL) Range. She graduated from California State 
Polytechnic University Pomona with a B.S. in anthropology/geography and a B.S. in social 
science and from The Claremont Graduate University with a M.A. in public policy with 
additional post-graduate work completed in comparative politics and government. Past 
professional experience includes research and program coordination in University, Non- 
Government Organization (NGO), and City Government settings. 

Dr. Robert J. Bunker attended California State Polytechnic University, Pomona and the 
Claremont Graduate University. He holds a Ph.D. in political science and an M.A. in 
government and bachelors' degrees in anthropology/geography, social science, behavioral 
science, and history. Dr. Bunker is Adjunct Professor, National Security Studies Program, 
California State University, San Bernardino, and Professor, Unconventional Warfare, American 
Military University, Manassas Park, Virginia. He has served as a consultant to both the military 
and law enforcement communities. His research focus is on the influence of technology on 
warfare and political organization and on the national security implications of emerging forms 
of warfare. Dr. Bunker's works have appeared in Parameters, Special Warfare, Army RDA, 
Military Intelligence, Red Thrust Star, Airpower Journal, Marine Corps Gazette, Institute of 
Land Warfare Papers, Institute For National Security Studies Occasional Papers, and various law 
enforcement publications, military encyclopedias, and in book chapters. 

Notes 

1. Background works include Robert J. Bunker and John P. Sullivan, “Cartel Evolution: 
Potentials and Consequences.”Transnational Organized Crime. Vol. 2, No. 2, 1998, pp. 55-74; 
John P. Sullivan and Adam Elkus, “State of Siege: Mexico’s Criminal Insurgency.” Small Wars 
Journal. August 2008, pp. 1-12; Hal Brands, Mexico’s Narco-Insurgency and U.S. Counter- 
Drug Policy. Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College, 2009; and Max G. 
Manwaring, A “New” Dynamic in the Western Hemisphere Security Environment: The Mexican 
Zetas and Other Private Armies. Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College, 
2009. 
2. See Ralph Peters, “The New Warrior Class.” Parameters. Vol. 24, No. 2. Summer 1994, pp. 
16-26; and Martin van Creveld, The Transformation of War. New York: The Free Press, 1991. 
3. Robert J. Bunker, ed. Narcos Over the Border: Gangs, Cartels and Mercenaries. London: 
Routledge,  2011. Initially published a special issue of Small Wars & Insurgencies, Vol. 21, No. 
1. These spiritual insights represent an extension of some of the conclusions drawn in a chapter 
by Pamela L. Bunker, Lisa J. Campbell, and Robert J. Bunker on “Torture, beheadings, and 
narcocultos.”  
Page 3 of 4  smallwarsjournal.com 
© 2010, Small Wars Foundation 
4. Max G. Manwaring,  Insurgency, Terrorism & Crime. Norman: University of Oklahoma 
Press, 2008, pp. 116-118. 


This is a single article excerpt of material published in Small Wars Journal. 
Published by and COPYRIGHT © 2010, Small Wars Foundation. 

Permission is granted to print single copies for personal, non-commercial use.  Select non-commercial use is licensed 
via a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 license and per our Terms of Use.   We are in this together. 



No FACTUAL STATEMENT should be relied upon without further investigation on your part sufficient to satisfy you in 
your independent judgment that it is true. 

Contact:  comment@smallwarsjournal.com 

Visit www.smallwarsjournal.com 

Cover Price:   Your call.  Support SWJ here. 


Page 4 of 4  smallwarsjournal.com 
© 2010, Small Wars Foundation 

No comments:

Post a Comment