The Separation between State and Religion

In time we will realize that Democracy is the entitlement of individuals to every right that was in its times alloted to kings. The right to speak and decide, to be treated with decency, to serve and be served by people in a State of “love” that is, to serve with one’s work for the development of ‘life’. To belong to the Kingdom of Human Beings without racial, national, social or academic separations. To love and be loved. To die at the service of the whole and be honored in one’s death, for one’s life and work was legitimately valued. To be graceful and grateful. To have the pride and the humility of being One with the Universe, One with every realm of Existence, One with every living and deceased soul. To treat with dignity and be treated with dignity for One is dignified together with All others and Life itself. To walk the path of compassion, not in the sorrow of guilt but in the pride of being. To take responsability for one’s mistakes and sufferings and stand up again and again like a hero and a heroine and face the struggle that is put at one’s feet and in one’s hands. Millions of people, millions and millions of people might take many generations to realize the consciousness of our humaneness but there is no other dignified path for the human being.

The “work” as I conceive it is psychological and political. Psychology is the connection between the different dimensions within one’s self and Politics is the actualization of that consciousness in our practical lives. Religion is the ceremony that binds the connectedness between the individual and the Universe. The separation between religion, politics and science, the arts and sports is, in the sphere of the social, the reflection of the schizophrenia within the individual and the masses. The dialogue between individuality and the "human" belongs to consciousness. The tendency to develop cults resides in the shortcomings we’are finding in life as it is structured today. “Life” has become the private property of a few priviledged who cannot profit from it because as soon as it is appropriated it stops to be “life” or “life-giving”.

We are all the victims of our own invention and each one is called upon to find solutions. The only problem is believing our selves incapable of finding them. We are now free to use all Systems of knowledge objectively, sharing them without imposing our will on each other. To become objective about our lives means to understand that the institutions that govern its experience are critically important. That we are one with the governments, one with the religious activities that mark its pace, that the arena’s in which we move our bodies and the laboratories in which we explore our possibilities are ALL part and parcel of our own personal responsibility. That WE ARE ONE WITH EACH OTHER AND EVERYTHING AROUND US and acknowledge for ourselves a bond of love in conscious responsibility. That we human beings know ourselves part of each other and are willing and able to act on our behalf for the benefit of each and every individual. That we no longer allow governments, industries, universities or any other institution to run along unchecked by the objective principles of humaneness. That we do not allow gurus to abuse their power or governors to steal the taxes and use them to their personal advantage in detriment of the whole. That we do not allow abuse from anyone anywhere because life is too beautiful to do so and that we are willing to stop the rampant crime with the necessary compassion Conscious knowledge is every individual's right. Conscious action is every individual's duty.

Blog Archive

Thursday 11 November 2010

Our different worlds


There’s something very strange about the fact that in English we cannot express something like gozo without saying I. The fact that the I is implicit in the form of the verb gives the soul of a Spanish speaker a very different dimension of the experience. I enjoy, I speak, I walk, I live are very different to gozo, habla, camino, vivo. It is inevitable less self centered than I enjoy, I speak…
The fact that gozo implies that I enjoy but is not explicit about it, allows me to feel that there’s something rather general about it, wonderfully general, like a “state” of joy to which I am a part but that that state of joy is in itself an even more objective reality than my self. I enjoy, I speak, seems to center around the I more than the act while gozo, hablo, centers around the act more than the individuality. A very different emotion and experience is connected with the words.
In the US this “I am”"I do” is very active while in England the I is less emphatic and the “could” and “would” soften it a great deal: could I come with you? Would you like me to work here? I would like to come, I would very much enjoy it…
I heard an English lady in an interview the other day and she said, “the lady gives very extreme examples that might work in America but England is different” talking about the woman who pays drug-addicts to get a vasectomy. I immediately realized that she was talking about the particular subjectivity of the people in each country. I also understood why it is very difficult for American or Europeans to take my language. There is something about how the language is spoken that will not help people understand each other and together with the kind of language a whole different approach to life is contained in it and that also makes it very difficult for people from different nations to understand each other. Only when we’re able to go beyond our nationalities into a more objective human reality, will we be able to communicate with each other. This cannot happen by itself, we must want it to happen and make it happen. New generations through the internet might some day come closer to that when they actually meet.
We live such different lives. The people in Medellín where I live, live inhuman lives. Women and men are killed easily by the men they owe money to for a hundred or two hundred dollars so that others become afraid and pay. Teenagers are killed by older teenagers if they are a little too strong so that they won’t be the ones killing them when they get old enough. The gang leaders are so because they’ve killed the most people.
People are killed everyday in miserable crimes and the news don’t even talk about them. The politicians are corrupt and so is most everybody else with power connections. The few who are not are counted and quickly taken care of by the sicarios, the teenage hired killers.
There is tremendous suffering in this country. The inhumanity and absurdity of things is experienced daily. The ignorance, the human poverty, the fear of the people and the hopelessness.
When will we start working seriously towards a more human world?
The effort is the same but the reward much more dignified.
The suffering is as much but the quality of life much more genuine.

No comments:

Post a Comment