The Separation between State and Religion

In time we will realize that Democracy is the entitlement of individuals to every right that was in its times alloted to kings. The right to speak and decide, to be treated with decency, to serve and be served by people in a State of “love” that is, to serve with one’s work for the development of ‘life’. To belong to the Kingdom of Human Beings without racial, national, social or academic separations. To love and be loved. To die at the service of the whole and be honored in one’s death, for one’s life and work was legitimately valued. To be graceful and grateful. To have the pride and the humility of being One with the Universe, One with every realm of Existence, One with every living and deceased soul. To treat with dignity and be treated with dignity for One is dignified together with All others and Life itself. To walk the path of compassion, not in the sorrow of guilt but in the pride of being. To take responsability for one’s mistakes and sufferings and stand up again and again like a hero and a heroine and face the struggle that is put at one’s feet and in one’s hands. Millions of people, millions and millions of people might take many generations to realize the consciousness of our humaneness but there is no other dignified path for the human being.

The “work” as I conceive it is psychological and political. Psychology is the connection between the different dimensions within one’s self and Politics is the actualization of that consciousness in our practical lives. Religion is the ceremony that binds the connectedness between the individual and the Universe. The separation between religion, politics and science, the arts and sports is, in the sphere of the social, the reflection of the schizophrenia within the individual and the masses. The dialogue between individuality and the "human" belongs to consciousness. The tendency to develop cults resides in the shortcomings we’are finding in life as it is structured today. “Life” has become the private property of a few priviledged who cannot profit from it because as soon as it is appropriated it stops to be “life” or “life-giving”.

We are all the victims of our own invention and each one is called upon to find solutions. The only problem is believing our selves incapable of finding them. We are now free to use all Systems of knowledge objectively, sharing them without imposing our will on each other. To become objective about our lives means to understand that the institutions that govern its experience are critically important. That we are one with the governments, one with the religious activities that mark its pace, that the arena’s in which we move our bodies and the laboratories in which we explore our possibilities are ALL part and parcel of our own personal responsibility. That WE ARE ONE WITH EACH OTHER AND EVERYTHING AROUND US and acknowledge for ourselves a bond of love in conscious responsibility. That we human beings know ourselves part of each other and are willing and able to act on our behalf for the benefit of each and every individual. That we no longer allow governments, industries, universities or any other institution to run along unchecked by the objective principles of humaneness. That we do not allow gurus to abuse their power or governors to steal the taxes and use them to their personal advantage in detriment of the whole. That we do not allow abuse from anyone anywhere because life is too beautiful to do so and that we are willing to stop the rampant crime with the necessary compassion Conscious knowledge is every individual's right. Conscious action is every individual's duty.

Sunday 4 July 2010

Wallander and Community - Correction 1














I was watching the German detective series called Wallander last night and was struck by the description of the process of leaving the family out as he got deep into becoming a good policeman-detective that Wallander gives his daughter because what he was describing was exactly the same I observed in committing to the FOF Cult and what after leaving, led me to conclude that the need to belong to a community and develop in it is what every human being longs for consciously or unconsciously. I have not seen this stated so bluntly anywhere and I wonder if it’s because it is taken for granted or because there had never been such a strong failure in society to incorporate people into a community as there is today resulting precisely in the huge number of people looking for cults to fulfill that need.
I think need is closer than wish or up there in the level of wish that having a wife or husband stands. Of course these are not absolutes in the sense that people can survive without partner or community but the question is, is no family or community the ideal we are heading towards or the inevitable outcome that we’re doomed towards?
It is certainly not that what I consider ideal is the old system of authoritarian hierarchic communities in which there was no individual freedom but it is also not the inhuman individualism that we seem to be racing towards what I support.
The road towards becoming more human seems to be walked by the most horrific inhuman acts rather than a slow ascending towards an ideal. It’s as if we could not just put ourselves to the aim and slowly walk towards it, it’s more as if we were constantly moving a step away from the horrors and the mistakes and instead of seriously learning from other’s experiences, each nation had to commit the same horrific acts before it realizes that more humanism and democracy are the only possible answer to the absurdity of today’s reality.
I was also watching the BBC debate in the Intelligence Square about whether capitalism had failed in the Ukraine or not. What was beautiful to watch was people dialoguing about issues that matter. Someone suggested that the Swedish form of Capitalism would have been less harmful.
At the end of the debate the man sustaining that capitalism had failed, stated that as long as people don’t stand up for the truth in every level of society, for the truth, freedom and equality, no real change is possible. I’m paraphrasing. It was very good to watch that amount of clarity in what seemed a very public venue.
Something else that was quite amazing was that the program went all the way from Kiev to MedellĂ­n! Language makes a big difference and most people here can’t understand those programs but most of the other programs that are watched are managing to “unify” people, to “standardize” people. The tendency to copy other people’s acts is so powerful that more and more the people here behave like Americans or Europeans. It isn’t very positive. People here use to be kind and human and they are becoming efficiently professional but with little real human caring or kindness. The business mind-frame is permeating the whole of society like it has in America.
The impression I got in America was that people were kind as long as you didn’t need help! It’s a “professional” kindness that exerts itself only as long as there’s an interest in the interchange taking place. In Europe people are not kind even if there’s an economic interchange. Of course, they are all probably kind between each other but that impossibility to go beyond one’s own nationality to be able to be kind to no matter who is what is worth struggling for. There is no real kindness until there’s “objective” kindness, the rest is just programming… conditioning. The utilitarian mind-frame is appallingly negative particularly for those who practice it. The bottom-line I believe, is that it is a kind of impression that tends to fortify the instinctive center or as my horrible guru use to say, the king of clubs. Perhaps that is why he only managed to make a cult dedicated to feeding his own king of clubs. He was never able to free himself from his programming. But the FOF doesn’t matter now as much as people and I do believe that the concern in relation to society itself is worth exploring. It’s as if the whole of humanity had shifted from the divine to the abominable and were actually beginning to find itself back into the human before it can even consider the divine again while at the same time realizing that there’s nothing “just” human about the human.
Today I certainly have no interest in the “divine” if it’s not deeply rooted in the human but of course, there is nothing truly human that is not divine. Life itself is the culture I wish to develop in. It’s such an honor to have the opportunity to live. That which I use to take so for granted in my youth is now such a precious opportunity. To live, to work, to interact with other people through the enveloping forces that determine us and therefore our lives.

No comments:

Post a Comment