Objectivity 1

Perhaps we could better grasp the idea of objectivity if we were able to better understand the Octave of Impressions or the table of hydrogens. In the Octave of Impressions it is fairly easy to verify that a clean room has a different impression on the individual that a dirty room would give him but the understanding of the objective reality of both rooms would also depend on the level of being of the individual experiencing them and what part of his being is affected by the impression. One individual sees the clean room and the dirty room and judges the owner of the dirty room and discards the possibility of relating to him because the room is dirty. Another individual can see through the façade of “cleanliness” in the clean room and understand that the cleanliness of the room nevertheless belongs to a dishonest man and that the state of dirt of the other man’s room reveals a man in a state of depression but an honest man nevertheless.

In this example there are different aspects worth considering.
Objectivity is not just in the appearance. If only the room is looked at, the reality of the situation is not grasped.
The individual observing can be as subjective as the appearance of the clean room that has been polished to give a particular impression.
The individual
The other individuals
The interaction between them
The physical, emotional, individual and social reality that envelopes them
All need to be taken into account to grasp the UNITY or Objective Reality of the situation.

Objective reality cannot be perceived objectively by subjective individuals but subjective individuals can unconsciously act objectively. The subjective state of an individual does not make his actions less objective.
A “conscious” mother would feed her baby just like an “unconscious” mother, the act does not necessarily change, what changes is the understanding of the action by the conscious and the unconscious woman. The “state” of consciousness of the individual completely changes the perception an individual has of the reality before him or her but not the reality.

Another aspect that needs to be clarified is the difference between subjective individuals, individuals in essence, in true personality, or objective. These terms are only talking about different “states” in the individual.
To be in essence and subjective does not carry the negative connotation that is being allotted to it in cults today discarding all human beings because they have not carried out intense inner work on themselves. It is very different to be in essence and subjective and ACT than to be in false personality and enter into processes of crime.

Another aspect that needs exploring is the objective quality of different realities be they objects, people, institutions or acts. The experience of observing a work of art has a completely different quality to it, no less valuable for that, to the experience of creating a work of art. In the experience of observing the work of art the observer is “touched” by the artist through the work of art while in creating a work of art, the artist is both touched by the means he’s using and “touches” it in a particular way that will affect the viewers. LIFE behaves in a very similar way to a work of art, touches and is touched by individuals experiencing and acting in it, affects them and transforms them and they equally affect and transform it. All other Objective Arts are but analogies of the Art of Living.
Thank you for sharing and allowing me to explore these things that are fortunately far from being fully digested.