The Separation between State and Religion

In time we will realize that Democracy is the entitlement of individuals to every right that was in its times alloted to kings. The right to speak and decide, to be treated with decency, to serve and be served by people in a State of “love” that is, to serve with one’s work for the development of ‘life’. To belong to the Kingdom of Human Beings without racial, national, social or academic separations. To love and be loved. To die at the service of the whole and be honored in one’s death, for one’s life and work was legitimately valued. To be graceful and grateful. To have the pride and the humility of being One with the Universe, One with every realm of Existence, One with every living and deceased soul. To treat with dignity and be treated with dignity for One is dignified together with All others and Life itself. To walk the path of compassion, not in the sorrow of guilt but in the pride of being. To take responsability for one’s mistakes and sufferings and stand up again and again like a hero and a heroine and face the struggle that is put at one’s feet and in one’s hands. Millions of people, millions and millions of people might take many generations to realize the consciousness of our humaneness but there is no other dignified path for the human being.

The “work” as I conceive it is psychological and political. Psychology is the connection between the different dimensions within one’s self and Politics is the actualization of that consciousness in our practical lives. Religion is the ceremony that binds the connectedness between the individual and the Universe. The separation between religion, politics and science, the arts and sports is, in the sphere of the social, the reflection of the schizophrenia within the individual and the masses. The dialogue between individuality and the "human" belongs to consciousness. The tendency to develop cults resides in the shortcomings we’are finding in life as it is structured today. “Life” has become the private property of a few priviledged who cannot profit from it because as soon as it is appropriated it stops to be “life” or “life-giving”.

We are all the victims of our own invention and each one is called upon to find solutions. The only problem is believing our selves incapable of finding them. We are now free to use all Systems of knowledge objectively, sharing them without imposing our will on each other. To become objective about our lives means to understand that the institutions that govern its experience are critically important. That we are one with the governments, one with the religious activities that mark its pace, that the arena’s in which we move our bodies and the laboratories in which we explore our possibilities are ALL part and parcel of our own personal responsibility. That WE ARE ONE WITH EACH OTHER AND EVERYTHING AROUND US and acknowledge for ourselves a bond of love in conscious responsibility. That we human beings know ourselves part of each other and are willing and able to act on our behalf for the benefit of each and every individual. That we no longer allow governments, industries, universities or any other institution to run along unchecked by the objective principles of humaneness. That we do not allow gurus to abuse their power or governors to steal the taxes and use them to their personal advantage in detriment of the whole. That we do not allow abuse from anyone anywhere because life is too beautiful to do so and that we are willing to stop the rampant crime with the necessary compassion Conscious knowledge is every individual's right. Conscious action is every individual's duty.

Friday 20 May 2011

Sex and Bankers


Email This Page
add comment
Print
Dominique Strauss-Kahn, head of the IMF, is arraigned on charges he sexually assaulted a hotel maid, 05/16/11. (photo: Emmanuel Dunand/AP)
Dominique Strauss-Kahn, head of the IMF, is arraigned on charges he sexually assaulted a hotel maid, 05/16/11. (photo: Emmanuel Dunand/AP)


Sex and Bankers

By Danny Schechter, Reader Supported News
19 May 11

Reader Supported News | Perspective

Strauss-Kahn and the secret culture of aggressive sexuality in the high-pressure world of bankers and banksters.

y colleague Mike Whitney asks: "So, what are the chances that Strauss-Kahn will get a fair trial now that he's been blasted as a serial sex offender in about 3,000 articles and in all the televised news reports?
Do you remember any Wall Street bankers being dragged off in handcuffs when they blew up the financial system and bilked people out of trillions of dollars?"
The answer to both questions is certainly "Non," in French, or "No," in English, but there's more to the connection between Sex and Wall Street. Without commenting on the evidence in this case - which has been asserted, not proven - there is a deeper context that is being ignored.
I call it the Testosterone Factor in "The Crime of Our Time," my book about how Wall Street criminally engineered the financial crisis.
Interesting, isn't it, that there have been so few references to the link between the pervasiveness of salacious sex and the highly-charged life of a class of "entitled" wealthy bankers who live off of others with few rules or restraints.
There is also often no news about that, or the practices of the IMF, which is often accused of raping poor and vulnerable countries with unfair structural adjustment programs. The IMF chief is now experiencing what many in France feel is an unfair "personal adjustment program" at the hands of the New York cops and courts.
Odd, isn't it, that there have been so few references in the coverage also to Eliot Spitzer, the one-time "Sheriff" of Wall Street who was denouncing criminal financial practices by the Bush administration when he was brought down in a sex scandal.
Strauss-Kahn had also been in the news lately as a possible Socialist presidential candidate to topple our pal Sarkosy in France, as well as a critic of US banking practices. He recently outraged official Washington by asserting that the Chinese economy was surpassing ours.
In both cases, powerful forces have motives to bring down such potential reformers, but, it is also true that in each case these men themselves were, on the surface anyway, sexually obsessed and prone to illegal behavior that put them - and others - at risk.
Both are Alpha Males known for pushing the envelope of personal responsibility. Both were known for personal arrogance and living in highly-secretive sexualized personal cultures. Writer Tristan Banon claimed she had to fight DSK off in an earlier incident, calling him a "strutting chimpanzee."
Bear in mind also that part of what intelligence agencies do these days in targeting people is to prepare sophisticated psychological profiles before they intervene. They know that the knowledge of the secret lives - and kinks - of public figures can easily discredit them. They specialize in foraging for dirt and can leak information or use it opportunistically.
Remember Richard Nixon's authorized break-in at the office of Daniel Ellsberg's psychiatrist pursuing highly personal information?
Nothing is off-limits, as people like former weapons inspector Scott Ritter learned as well when he became embroiled in a mini sex-caper.
When people are highly stressed they are prone to making mistakes. The agencies shadowing them know that, and from time to time encourage it or just wait for the opportunity to help them bring themselves down.
What needs to be examined is how the crimes of the rich and powerful are treated. Bush's bombing and Geithner's tax maneuvers were ignored.
But when sex is involved, all bets are off.
Sex scandals have become a staple of media exploitation with personal morality plays trumping political morality confrontations every time.
They are both great distractions and effective tools of character assassination which are often more effective than more violent ways to neutralize people considered dangerous.
That's why the FBI was so hot to discredit Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. with leaks of so-called wiretapped sex tapes. In his case, this tactic failed but the other worked.
In some cases both tactics are deployed, as in the physical assassination of Bin Laden and then the character-killing aimed at his supporters through the release of porn allegedly found in his "lair."
Intense sexual appetites are an extension of the "culture" of an avaricious financial world. Illegal sex and Wall Street (or in La Defense, France's financial district) has long been linked, writes Heidi Moore:
"This is all a reminder that the financial district hasn't always been gleaming skyscrapers and Starbucks."
Consider this passage from City of Eros: New York City, Prostitution, and the Commercialization of Sex, 1790-1920: "Adjacent to the Wall Street business district, prostitutes worked in saloons along Greenwich Street, taking men upstairs. In addition, immediately south of Wall Street was the Battery Tender-loin, on Whitehall Street. The Water Street area, however, remained the most significant and poorest waterfront zone of prostitution. Amid the rookeries, rat pits and dance halls, prostitutes exposed in each window to the public view plied their trade."
In the modern era, many of the Street's most macho traders are, according to David Russell who worked in the industry for two decades, known as "swinging dicks." It is well known that the big money in Wall Street has kept a vibrant, upscale sex industry alive and well.
There has been one scandal after another. Here are a few cases cited by Moore before Spitzer's demise:
  • BP Chief Executive John Browne left both his post at the oil company and his directorship at Goldman Sachs Group last year after it was revealed that Lord Browne had lied to a court about his young male lover, whom he had met through an escort-service Web site.


  • A group of six women sued Dresdner Kleinwort in 2006 for $1.4 billion on allegations that male executives entertained clients at strip clubs and even brought prostitutes back to the office. The case was settled out of court in 2007.


  • Canadian hedge fund manager Paul Eustace in 2007, by his own admission in a deposition filed in court lied to investors and cheated on his wife with a stripper.


  • In 1987, Peter Detwiler, vice chairman of E.F. Hutton & Co., was, according to court testimony, instructed by his client, Tesoro Petroleum Corp. Chairman Robert V. West, to hire a blonde prostitute for the finance minister of Trinidad & Tobago, which had been supporting a tax issue that would have hurt Tesoro's profits.


  • A woman claiming to have been Bernard Madoff's mistress published a book about their secret liaisons. Earlier his secretary said he had a fondness for massages in an article in Vanity Fair.
Wall Street's fall is said to have brought down the sex industry almost as if it had been a fully owned subsidiary, if not an extension, of the financial services business.
To find out more, I spoke to Jonathan Albert, a psychologist practicing in mid-Manhattan.
He told me, "I see a lot of clients in NYC who are impacted by the economic crisis. People deal with stress in many different ways. Some people exercise, some people over-eat, some use drugs and alcohol, some even sexualize those feelings."
"Sexualize?" I asked him, "How do they sexualize these feelings?"
His response, "I've seen a lot of Wall Streeters who sexualize feelings of anxiety and stress and depression. So for example they might rely on adult sexual services to deal with those feelings."
Loretta Napoleoni, an Italian author who worked on Wall Street for years, offers a provocative thesis for how the need for paid sex "on the wild side" became part of the culture of irresponsibility.
"I can tell you that this is absolutely true because being a woman, having worked in finance 20 years ago I could tell you that even at that time - when the market was not going up so much - these guys, all they talk is sex."
She complemented her personal experience by citing a study by researchers from Oxford University.
"The study discovered, that an excessive production of testosterone, in a period of fantastic financial exuberance, creates a sort of confusion. It is what people in sports call 'being in the zone,' which means you get in a certain situation where you feel that you will always win. That you are infallible."
I asked Dr. Albert if that finding may have indeed had relevance to Spitzer or be endemic in the industry? His reply, "I do see this a lot in the finance industry, yes, people in positions of power often feel as if they can perhaps get away with it. There is sometimes a sense of entitlement."
"They feel entitled to take part in risky behavior?" I pressed.
"High-risk behavior. It's similar to what they do on a daily basis. They invest millions and millions of dollars and there is a great risk involved with that. The same is true with using the services of a prostitute. Obviously there are great health risks; their relationship is in great danger if they are using the services of a prostitute.
"A lot of people skate on the excitement, on that euphoric rush.
"The culture of risk on Wall Street was intoxicating to many in the same way that gamblers become addicted or report a rush when they are winning.
"The euphoria of life in the fast lane often implodes when one's luck runs out leading to depression and family breakups. One remedy is going to self-help groups like 'The Wall Street Wives Club,' formed to empower and serve the needs of wives and girlfriends whose husbands or significant others work in the stressful and volatile brokerage community.
"Men are often uncomfortable expressing their feelings."
Some of Dr. Albert's clients coped with the pressures on them to perform in kinkier ways.
".... they just want to let loose, relax and take a very passive role in their sexual practice. So they may seek out the services of a dominatrix, where they are at the mercy of this sex worker. I've had clients who seek out services where they get whipped, cuffed, put on a leash like a dog."
Beating others can also be part of this culture. There is violence lurking to the surface that can easily erupt when desires are denied.
I am not being moralistic here, but a climate of narcissism and living secret lives often desensitizes its practitioners leaving them little time to think of how their actions may affect others. (Or how the policies they promote impact on their customers or the poor!)
None of this context excuses anything that Strauss-Kahn may or may not have done, but what it does do is shine some light on a culture of aggressive power-driven hyper-sexuality that our media is often too hypocritical to investigate.

News Dissector Danny Schechter elaborates on this issue in his book, "The Crime of Our Time," and in a DVD extra to his film "Plunder - The Crime of Our Time" (PlunderTheCrimeOfOurTime.com). You may contact him at dissector@mediachannel.org.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.
 

Comments  

 
+6# rbrooks 2011-05-19 15:32
Best analysis I have seen on DSK takedown:

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Dominique-Strauss-Kahn-was-by-Mike-Whitney-110519-58.html

It's not pretty but it sure as bloody hell is familiar.

rbrooks
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0# acomfort 2011-05-19 21:12
Quote: "In some cases both tactics are deployed, as in the physical assassination of Bin Laden." . . . This should say the "alleged physical assassination" . . . as no evidence has yet been produced by the Obama administration that Bin Laden was assassinated. Has the government and the media ever lied to us?? Where are the weapons of mass destruction?? Must we still believe what the authorities say when no evidence is provided? Has Obama ever lied to us? 

Here are a few.
"I'm going to close down Guantanamo!
. . . "Meetings will be more open to the public" . . . "When there is a tax bill being debated in congress you will know the names of the corporations that will benefit" . . . "As president I will ensure that financial rescue plans protect your money instead of enriching CEOs" . . . There are many more . . . Now why does the media take it as fact that he killed Bin Laden? 

acomfort
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0# acomfort 2011-05-19 21:14
"In some cases both tactics are deployed, as in the physical assassination of Bin Laden." . . . This should say the "alleged physical assassination" . . . as no evidence has yet been produced by the Obama administration that Bin Laden was assassinated. Has the government ever lied to us?? Must we still believe what the authorities say when no evidence is provided? Has Obama ever lied to us? 

Here are a few.
"I'm going to close down Guantanamo!
. . . "Meetings will be more open to the public" . . . "When there is a tax bill being debated in congress you will know the names of the corporations that will benefit" . . . "As president I will ensure that financial rescue plans protect your money instead of enriching CEOs" . . . There are many more . . . Now why does the media take it as fact that he killed Bin Laden? 

Otherwise; good article. 
acomfort
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1# Texas Aggie 2011-05-19 21:15
Talking with my French teachers i get the idea that the Droit du Seigneur is still part of the French culture. They seem to feel that there isn't an important difference between flirting and forcible rape. That stalking or sexual harassment is unacceptable isn't part of the French, and possibly European, culture.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1# acomfort 2011-05-19 21:18
"In some cases both tactics are deployed, as in the physical assassination of Bin Laden." . . . This should say the "alleged physical assassination" . . . as no evidence has yet been produced by the Obama administration that Bin Laden was assassinated. Has the government ever lied to us?? Must we still believe what the authorities say when no evidence is provided? Has Obama ever lied to us? 

Here are a few.
"I'm going to close down Guantanamo!
. . . "Meetings will be more open to the public" . . . "When there is a tax bill being debated in congress you will know the names of the corporations that will benefit" . . . "As president I will ensure that financial rescue plans protect your money instead of enriching CEOs" . . . There are many more . . . Now why does the media take it as fact that he killed Bin Laden? 

Otherwise, this is a good article. 
acomfort
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+4# Byronator 2011-05-19 21:32
OK, so these arrogant, nauseating dicks are as perverted as the Roman Emperors in the twilight of their decaying empire. We're not amused.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2# touchetdooshie 2011-05-19 21:50
"...deeper context that is being ignored," oh, really? In your eagerness to seize what you perceive as an opportunity to tout your book you mislead us, and at great length. This story is not about the salacious adventurism of the powerful, it's about a criminal sexual assault on an unwilling person. That's all it's about.

Ref Mike Whitney's concern, the same stuff gets written up in my local newspaper with no more regard for innocence until proven guilty than in this case.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0# Virginia 2011-05-19 21:56
The tainted jury syndrome reminds me of the bankster bribery where their lobbyists spend millions of dollars to get the ears of Congressional and state legislators... kinda "tit for tat" don't ya think...or is it called karma?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+3# ER444 2011-05-20 00:09
This kind of treatment of Kahn and of any other person in any other case is shameful. He may be a strutting French "swinging dick" BUT we are a land of law AND one is innocent until proven guilty. Parading him unshaven in handcuffs before the wolfpack called the press is primitive and inexcusable. Comparing Kahn's case to Bradley Manning's is a little bit like comparing apples and oranges, but the principle is the same. They are both accused of a crime but have not been brought to trial and as such should, MUST be treated like innocent people until proven guilty. Even our constitutional expert for a president has proclaimed Mr. Manning to be guilty BEFORE a fair trial. This country used to be a beacon of truth, a role model, a bastion idealism for the rest of the world. Where did we go wrong. We are being wire tapped, x-rayed, spied on, and in many cases locked away without due process. The dismantling of the basic values we used to call "American" is very dangerous, and frightening. Dear politicians, take our country back from the powers lurking in the shadows. Support the likes of former and hopefully future Senator Feingold in his attempt to put some character back into our politics by turning down the pieces of silver offered by corporate America trying to by our elections. Help Eric Schneiderman go after the baron banks. Our nation needs to reach for "idealism" again.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+6# alice indigo 2011-05-20 00:27
Comparing a shameful sexual attack to the actions of the Wall Street folks who brought our finances down is comparing apples to oranges. Please tell Mike Whitney not to trivialize what this woman has been through. It is one thing to rob me of my money, it is a whole other ballgame to attack my person, to rob me of my dignity. Never trivialize the lasting impact that this type of attack has on a person. It is one thing to fantasize sexual feelings or have an affair with a willing partner but to force yourself on an innocent person. No excuses. None. I commend the hotel personnel and the NY police for their fast action. If what I read in the paper is true, I hope this woman has the best lawyer in the world because a man this powerful and wealthy will pull every trick in the book to cover his alleged behavior.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0# HeidiStevenson 2011-05-20 01:05
My thanks to Danny Schechters insightful commentary. 

The only thing that we actually know as true is that Strauss-Kahn has been accused of an act that many (most?) men in his position are probably guilty of. 

But there's something we can be almost certain about: The accusation exists only because he ran afoul of the wrong folk. (Such as his call for a new world currency?)

Here's what's suspicious to me: If S-K is guilty of this particular instance, then he's almost certainly guilty of many others. As Schechter points out, such men feel entitled. So why pick him up now? Why treat him as public enemy #1? 

Guilty or not, Strauss-Kahn is clearly the target of a hit. He knows it, and that's why he resigned from the IMF. It's his best chance of getting off. Guilty or not.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0# Tom Ganiatsos 2011-05-20 01:15
The word was "rutting" not "strutting".
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+5# rf 2011-05-20 03:30
Rape is real crime...Financially destroying a few million people is just good business!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1# Capn Canard 2011-05-20 05:48
rf, nice... Americans are about money above all.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+5# fredboy 2011-05-20 04:08
A guy needs a new heart and the transplant doc gives him two choices: the heart of a 20 year old Olympic athlete or the heart of an overweight 50ish banker who smoked, drank, and had horrible eating habits. The guy immediately chose the banker's heart. When asked why, he replied "Because I want the heart that's never been used..."
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1# bswein99 2011-05-20 04:37
This article is a perfect case of arguing by innuendo, by the accumulation of somewhat relevant data that makes it seem as if we're getting the inside skinny on the DSK case, and then transitioning into a completely unremarkable discussion of powerful men liking the services of prostitutes and strippers (Rick, I'm shocked to hear there's gambling going on in this establishment...) What very likely happened in the DSK case is a man who tends to be aggressive sexually had poor impulse control and attacked exactly the person most likely to report him--a (nearly) powerless woman. There was no inside dope from this or that agency; those folks always like to make us feel like they're the all-seeing eye, but I assure you, they could be entirely removed from the Spitzer/DSK/John Edwards/Arnold/B.Clinton equation, and we would still have sex crimes and sex scandals. No need to "tart" this story up with a Spy v. Spy subtext--it's bad enough just the way it is.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+7# Sunnyduck 2011-05-20 04:39
Awww poor over stressed over worked over testosteroned financial warriors. The hormones made them do it. Their enemies set them up. They tripped on a rock. The sun got in their eyes... How could they possibly be expected to exercise self control? There is no comparison between a financial crime and raping a woman. Is DSK guilty of rape? We'll probably never know because the woman who made the complaint will be the one who is put on trial.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1# Fraenkel.1 2011-05-20 06:47
Nothing surprising as to what happended.

Priorities of our culture are, in no particular order, athletics, religion and sex, or at least as expressed in the media. It does keep people's minds off the real problems such as the economic meltdown of the US. As someone pointed out above the real crimes of the bankers
are that thay ruined the lives of millions of people.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

 
 
1400 symbols left

 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment