The Separation between State and Religion

In time we will realize that Democracy is the entitlement of individuals to every right that was in its times alloted to kings. The right to speak and decide, to be treated with decency, to serve and be served by people in a State of “love” that is, to serve with one’s work for the development of ‘life’. To belong to the Kingdom of Human Beings without racial, national, social or academic separations. To love and be loved. To die at the service of the whole and be honored in one’s death, for one’s life and work was legitimately valued. To be graceful and grateful. To have the pride and the humility of being One with the Universe, One with every realm of Existence, One with every living and deceased soul. To treat with dignity and be treated with dignity for One is dignified together with All others and Life itself. To walk the path of compassion, not in the sorrow of guilt but in the pride of being. To take responsability for one’s mistakes and sufferings and stand up again and again like a hero and a heroine and face the struggle that is put at one’s feet and in one’s hands. Millions of people, millions and millions of people might take many generations to realize the consciousness of our humaneness but there is no other dignified path for the human being.

The “work” as I conceive it is psychological and political. Psychology is the connection between the different dimensions within one’s self and Politics is the actualization of that consciousness in our practical lives. Religion is the ceremony that binds the connectedness between the individual and the Universe. The separation between religion, politics and science, the arts and sports is, in the sphere of the social, the reflection of the schizophrenia within the individual and the masses. The dialogue between individuality and the "human" belongs to consciousness. The tendency to develop cults resides in the shortcomings we’are finding in life as it is structured today. “Life” has become the private property of a few priviledged who cannot profit from it because as soon as it is appropriated it stops to be “life” or “life-giving”.

We are all the victims of our own invention and each one is called upon to find solutions. The only problem is believing our selves incapable of finding them. We are now free to use all Systems of knowledge objectively, sharing them without imposing our will on each other. To become objective about our lives means to understand that the institutions that govern its experience are critically important. That we are one with the governments, one with the religious activities that mark its pace, that the arena’s in which we move our bodies and the laboratories in which we explore our possibilities are ALL part and parcel of our own personal responsibility. That WE ARE ONE WITH EACH OTHER AND EVERYTHING AROUND US and acknowledge for ourselves a bond of love in conscious responsibility. That we human beings know ourselves part of each other and are willing and able to act on our behalf for the benefit of each and every individual. That we no longer allow governments, industries, universities or any other institution to run along unchecked by the objective principles of humaneness. That we do not allow gurus to abuse their power or governors to steal the taxes and use them to their personal advantage in detriment of the whole. That we do not allow abuse from anyone anywhere because life is too beautiful to do so and that we are willing to stop the rampant crime with the necessary compassion Conscious knowledge is every individual's right. Conscious action is every individual's duty.

Saturday 27 August 2011

Suicide in The Fellowship of Friends Cult, aka Pathway to Presence





121. Arthur - August 27, 2011










I wonder how many in the current FOF think Robert Burton is such a such that they would submit to a Jim Jones suicide pact?
Elena: I found the latter in the fofblog and put like that is not understanding the question of cults or the FOF cult in particular. For one, the gradual dismantling of people's personality has already taken place and there are hundreds of Fellowship members that no longer have enough will to leave the cult even if they ever realized it to be a good idea. They're I or self does not follow their intellectual or emotional centers. These have already been de-structured to the point that no matter how reasonable they thought or how much they needed human support, their I or self is unable to act on their pleas. This is important to observe if one is serious in trying to understand what actually happens in cults. The I of the members, their sense of themselves, their individuality, has been replaced by their place in the cult under the authority of the guru. The guru has replaced their free will and they have given up their free will in the conviction that giving it up will lead them to "heaven" or that at least, if they are obedient of the "master" who they believe a divinity, they will be protected from "hell" and suffering. Most cult members of our times are much more programed by the traditional christian mentality of heaven and hell and they are already very much prone to submission and obedience by the time they join the cult.  The member must be convinced of the divinity of the guru but convincing him or her is not difficult at all. It just takes some people to be obeying the guru for others to imitate the obedience. This allows him or her to commit and comply unconditionally, that is, to sacrifice his and her own free will to the will of the guru and the subsequent acts of satisfying each and every one of his whims becomes the act of "adoration". Sacrifice and adoration to the false calf becomes the only meaning of their every day worthless lives.
To ask wether people in the fellowship cult would be willing to commit suicide like in Jonestown is not the right question if we wish to understand suicide in the Fellowship cult, because it is not  taking into account the actual differences between the two cults. Evil learns its lessons and one should be able to realize that it learnt the mistakes it made in Jonestown to not make them as crudely in following cults. The Fellowship cult is much more "refined" than Jonestown. It completely abolished second line of work and jumped from self annihilation to divine surrender. It did not confront society or the social structure of capitalism like Jonestown did, it simply killed the "six billion dead people of the planet". It does not need to argue with "life" because it killed it. It is smart enough to stay so in line with it that it does not need to challenge it: it simply disappeared it and became invisible to it in complying with each and all its "laws" while at the same time, abolishing the human (s) and leaving only the divine guru. 
The people in Jonestown committed suicide at a critical moment in which the confrontation with life was too blunt to keep it a secret and the guru knew it. He had to force people into a sublimation of the horrors they had lived so that the horrors they had gone through would not be looked at bare and square. 
Robert Burton does not need all that. His sex life is widely accepted and supported. His abuses are too common in life to be questionable and every one inside likes the gold alchemy "glamour" convinced that trading the facts of life for an imaginary glitter is a deal worth paying for: it is the middle classes' opportunity to live out its frustrated dreams of belonging to an upper class. 
So NO, the members of the Fellowship cult will probably not commit suicide en masse like the people in Jonestown. They have already sacrificed their will to the guru so they are already non existent. Some will commit suicide like Abraham Goldman when the pain is too severe to avoid it, others will dry away in their own absence. The body does not go too far without one's presence. It continues to do what it's told but withers away. It dies of "self" starvation. 
It is interesting how the System turned around against the people and was used to enslave them. Now that I am working with it again it is easy to find how exactly it was used to manipulate people. I'll write about it in later posts. For now, the idea of "giving up one's will" to the teacher is one of the ideas that was manipulated and used against the members. In a real School, a teacher would assume authority for only some time, while the pupil strengthens and coordinates his or her own self based on trust. To put the pupil in contact with his and her own self is the aim of a true teacher, not to replace the will of the pupil for ever. Replacing the "life" within every individual, the "guru" of the cult puts the members in a retrograde disintegrating process. Keeping the reigns of the pupil's will is the most pervasive act any teacher can do and the consequences are as damaging for him as for the pupil. He might abuse and profit from it for some time but in the long run, the weight of those souls hanging on to his will keep them all entrenched. 
Mass Suicide is not necessary in a cult like the Fellowship of Friends. The members are already in an accelerated form of self annihilation: They are disappearing en masse without needing to spill blood. It is the perfection of slavery: people voluntarily self sacrificing themselves for the eccentricities of a sociopath. Nothing noble or humane about it: simply rampant decadence. 

No comments:

Post a Comment