The Separation between State and Religion

In time we will realize that Democracy is the entitlement of individuals to every right that was in its times alloted to kings. The right to speak and decide, to be treated with decency, to serve and be served by people in a State of “love” that is, to serve with one’s work for the development of ‘life’. To belong to the Kingdom of Human Beings without racial, national, social or academic separations. To love and be loved. To die at the service of the whole and be honored in one’s death, for one’s life and work was legitimately valued. To be graceful and grateful. To have the pride and the humility of being One with the Universe, One with every realm of Existence, One with every living and deceased soul. To treat with dignity and be treated with dignity for One is dignified together with All others and Life itself. To walk the path of compassion, not in the sorrow of guilt but in the pride of being. To take responsability for one’s mistakes and sufferings and stand up again and again like a hero and a heroine and face the struggle that is put at one’s feet and in one’s hands. Millions of people, millions and millions of people might take many generations to realize the consciousness of our humaneness but there is no other dignified path for the human being.

The “work” as I conceive it is psychological and political. Psychology is the connection between the different dimensions within one’s self and Politics is the actualization of that consciousness in our practical lives. Religion is the ceremony that binds the connectedness between the individual and the Universe. The separation between religion, politics and science, the arts and sports is, in the sphere of the social, the reflection of the schizophrenia within the individual and the masses. The dialogue between individuality and the "human" belongs to consciousness. The tendency to develop cults resides in the shortcomings we’are finding in life as it is structured today. “Life” has become the private property of a few priviledged who cannot profit from it because as soon as it is appropriated it stops to be “life” or “life-giving”.

We are all the victims of our own invention and each one is called upon to find solutions. The only problem is believing our selves incapable of finding them. We are now free to use all Systems of knowledge objectively, sharing them without imposing our will on each other. To become objective about our lives means to understand that the institutions that govern its experience are critically important. That we are one with the governments, one with the religious activities that mark its pace, that the arena’s in which we move our bodies and the laboratories in which we explore our possibilities are ALL part and parcel of our own personal responsibility. That WE ARE ONE WITH EACH OTHER AND EVERYTHING AROUND US and acknowledge for ourselves a bond of love in conscious responsibility. That we human beings know ourselves part of each other and are willing and able to act on our behalf for the benefit of each and every individual. That we no longer allow governments, industries, universities or any other institution to run along unchecked by the objective principles of humaneness. That we do not allow gurus to abuse their power or governors to steal the taxes and use them to their personal advantage in detriment of the whole. That we do not allow abuse from anyone anywhere because life is too beautiful to do so and that we are willing to stop the rampant crime with the necessary compassion Conscious knowledge is every individual's right. Conscious action is every individual's duty.

Blog Archive

Thursday, 17 September 2009

Sister blogger!!

"Sister blogger" says Old FoF after the moderator has assured him he won't be letting me back in! He's able to relax and present the diplomatic side of himself for the show.  How doesn't it make you people puke? You can't see the farce? And if you do see it it doesn't affect you much. How interesting! It's as if one lived full of buffers to be able to have a comfortable existence. How can that be comfortable? How decadent. Definitely not for me. I better look for another job!


Strange how the moderator has turned out to be the worst enemy for free speech! They are looking up at him as if he were the new a unquestionable authority, even apologizing for speaking about me when he tells them not to. The most difficult thing about being supported in any way is not allowing the credit go straight to one's ego. When one verifies that, it's much easier to understand how a Robert would have lost it all the way down to hell. I still laugh when I think of Steve's greatest quote: "I've nothing personal against you, I just don't like your brain" Isn't that funny? It's a bit like when I said to my husband: "I'm as calm as a furious bull!"  That's my "normal" state! So good to laugh!





But then I suppose the other extreme is just as decadent: Picking on everything one sees because it is decadent. Oh dear! Does one become indifferent then? Does one pretend that one doesn't see all those things and that they don't bother one so that one can have so called friends? but if no one says anything, how are things ever going to improve?