The Separation between State and Religion

In time we will realize that Democracy is the entitlement of individuals to every right that was in its times alloted to kings. The right to speak and decide, to be treated with decency, to serve and be served by people in a State of “love” that is, to serve with one’s work for the development of ‘life’. To belong to the Kingdom of Human Beings without racial, national, social or academic separations. To love and be loved. To die at the service of the whole and be honored in one’s death, for one’s life and work was legitimately valued. To be graceful and grateful. To have the pride and the humility of being One with the Universe, One with every realm of Existence, One with every living and deceased soul. To treat with dignity and be treated with dignity for One is dignified together with All others and Life itself. To walk the path of compassion, not in the sorrow of guilt but in the pride of being. To take responsability for one’s mistakes and sufferings and stand up again and again like a hero and a heroine and face the struggle that is put at one’s feet and in one’s hands. Millions of people, millions and millions of people might take many generations to realize the consciousness of our humaneness but there is no other dignified path for the human being.

The “work” as I conceive it is psychological and political. Psychology is the connection between the different dimensions within one’s self and Politics is the actualization of that consciousness in our practical lives. Religion is the ceremony that binds the connectedness between the individual and the Universe. The separation between religion, politics and science, the arts and sports is, in the sphere of the social, the reflection of the schizophrenia within the individual and the masses. The dialogue between individuality and the "human" belongs to consciousness. The tendency to develop cults resides in the shortcomings we’are finding in life as it is structured today. “Life” has become the private property of a few priviledged who cannot profit from it because as soon as it is appropriated it stops to be “life” or “life-giving”.

We are all the victims of our own invention and each one is called upon to find solutions. The only problem is believing our selves incapable of finding them. We are now free to use all Systems of knowledge objectively, sharing them without imposing our will on each other. To become objective about our lives means to understand that the institutions that govern its experience are critically important. That we are one with the governments, one with the religious activities that mark its pace, that the arena’s in which we move our bodies and the laboratories in which we explore our possibilities are ALL part and parcel of our own personal responsibility. That WE ARE ONE WITH EACH OTHER AND EVERYTHING AROUND US and acknowledge for ourselves a bond of love in conscious responsibility. That we human beings know ourselves part of each other and are willing and able to act on our behalf for the benefit of each and every individual. That we no longer allow governments, industries, universities or any other institution to run along unchecked by the objective principles of humaneness. That we do not allow gurus to abuse their power or governors to steal the taxes and use them to their personal advantage in detriment of the whole. That we do not allow abuse from anyone anywhere because life is too beautiful to do so and that we are willing to stop the rampant crime with the necessary compassion Conscious knowledge is every individual's right. Conscious action is every individual's duty.

Blog Archive

Saturday 12 September 2009

28. James Mclemore - September 12, 2009 Pg 82







Dragon, you asked…..
“What is it deep inside you what let you disapprove some special words written by the other part/ner?”
I do not wish to disappoint you, but I am not sure it came from anything all that deep inside. The main point of my post had to do with the subject of signing /not signing the petition, and my opinion that we not spend time picking at each other on our individual approaches to posting and what people have to offer here. I happened to write the post shortly after perusing Elena’s blog. Perhaps my post could have done without the paragraph you quoted. It was not said just as a dig towards Elena, and I will readily admit that some parts of Elena’s posts were as much rebuttal as they were attack. There are parts of Elena I admire very much, and yet her posts still sounded like more of the same and not something I personally wish to read. I used it as an example to make a point. When I read Elena’s blog, it sounded more like a blog about a blog and some of the people that post here than it did about the fellowship of friends. When that sort of thing happens here on this blog is when it seems to me we get off track. I just think our energies are better spent in other ways. It will have been an error on my part to mention and be critial of Elena’s blog if it returns us to debating Elena again. If you wish to discuss this further with me you can write me at jmsmclm(at)gmail(dot)com
Elena – you can certainly write me there also if you wish.
______________________
You're such an interesting guy James! You're filled with contradictions but like all of us you can't see them. 
For example you are kind and unkind at the same time!: If we're going to talk about Elena, let's not talk here but you can talk to me if you like Elena!!!
BUT NOT ON THE BLOG, HERE SHE'S BEEN RIGHTFULLY BANNED, it is forbidden to even talk about her!!!!!
Why? The issues that are good for you in Old FOF, Vena, Bruce etc, aren't good for Elena! They have rights! But not Elena!
And your idea that all the blog is about is the FOF is like Robert's idea that all the FOF is about is awakening!
Many of you want people to behave exactly the way the cult expected us to behave, channelled in a unidirectional objective avoiding everything else. THAT is what we did in the Fellowship and that is why we gave up our lives for it. 
You are conditioning people to speak only about the FOF but the FOF is only an excuse to share our selves today! It matters only in as much as what our position in relation to it is. Everything we're saying about it speaks about us, not it. Whether we want to leave it open or close it, what we show is our level of understanding of the human issues involved and our ability to deal with them. Jomo Piñata is a fascinating character here and I have enormous respect for him but beyond the laws are the people, the human beings involved and it is us who have to write and change the laws. It took an ex-soldier twenty years of fighting to get laws passed that would prohibit establishments from prohibiting the entrance of disabled war veterans or any other kind of people with disabilities. Twenty years of fighting for something that was elementary human! 
And here we pretend that stopping people from raping, exploiting, hurting and psychologically dis-enabling others can't be stopped! As Bruce says: GIVE ME A FUCKING BREAK!
Allow me to grant you one thing: It is very nice to see many more people writing on the FOF blog. People's voices are beautiful! But I never stopped them from writing, they were simply unwilling to share and didn't like being challenged!
With that it is not that I don't admit that I'm a pain in the ass, because I am! Or that I am not glad you've thrown me out and can't throw me out of here! FREEEEEEEEEDOM! it feels so good!
This is all about love, never forget that!