The Separation between State and Religion

In time we will realize that Democracy is the entitlement of individuals to every right that was in its times alloted to kings. The right to speak and decide, to be treated with decency, to serve and be served by people in a State of “love” that is, to serve with one’s work for the development of ‘life’. To belong to the Kingdom of Human Beings without racial, national, social or academic separations. To love and be loved. To die at the service of the whole and be honored in one’s death, for one’s life and work was legitimately valued. To be graceful and grateful. To have the pride and the humility of being One with the Universe, One with every realm of Existence, One with every living and deceased soul. To treat with dignity and be treated with dignity for One is dignified together with All others and Life itself. To walk the path of compassion, not in the sorrow of guilt but in the pride of being. To take responsability for one’s mistakes and sufferings and stand up again and again like a hero and a heroine and face the struggle that is put at one’s feet and in one’s hands. Millions of people, millions and millions of people might take many generations to realize the consciousness of our humaneness but there is no other dignified path for the human being.

The “work” as I conceive it is psychological and political. Psychology is the connection between the different dimensions within one’s self and Politics is the actualization of that consciousness in our practical lives. Religion is the ceremony that binds the connectedness between the individual and the Universe. The separation between religion, politics and science, the arts and sports is, in the sphere of the social, the reflection of the schizophrenia within the individual and the masses. The dialogue between individuality and the "human" belongs to consciousness. The tendency to develop cults resides in the shortcomings we’are finding in life as it is structured today. “Life” has become the private property of a few priviledged who cannot profit from it because as soon as it is appropriated it stops to be “life” or “life-giving”.

We are all the victims of our own invention and each one is called upon to find solutions. The only problem is believing our selves incapable of finding them. We are now free to use all Systems of knowledge objectively, sharing them without imposing our will on each other. To become objective about our lives means to understand that the institutions that govern its experience are critically important. That we are one with the governments, one with the religious activities that mark its pace, that the arena’s in which we move our bodies and the laboratories in which we explore our possibilities are ALL part and parcel of our own personal responsibility. That WE ARE ONE WITH EACH OTHER AND EVERYTHING AROUND US and acknowledge for ourselves a bond of love in conscious responsibility. That we human beings know ourselves part of each other and are willing and able to act on our behalf for the benefit of each and every individual. That we no longer allow governments, industries, universities or any other institution to run along unchecked by the objective principles of humaneness. That we do not allow gurus to abuse their power or governors to steal the taxes and use them to their personal advantage in detriment of the whole. That we do not allow abuse from anyone anywhere because life is too beautiful to do so and that we are willing to stop the rampant crime with the necessary compassion Conscious knowledge is every individual's right. Conscious action is every individual's duty.

Blog Archive

Sunday, 30 May 2010

Ton - Elena May 30

31 Ton
e: “I can only answer you with this one again.”
ya, ya, you know i’ve read this and responded already… so why do you feel a compulsion to post it again elena ? why do you feel you always have to have the last word, ‘the final say’ ? why do you feel you always have to be ‘right’ elena ? why do you always feel the need to prove to yourself that others are ‘wrong’ or somehow ‘inferior’ to you ? what is it in you elena, that makes you want to feel ‘superior’ to others ? why do you feel you always have to ‘present something higher’ than what someone else has already said ? what is the source of this compulsion to play the game of ‘one-ups-manship’ ? why elena, do you seek so desperately outside of yourself for a sense of validation ? what is the source elena, of your over-weaning and over-bearing-hubris ? do you know ? are you even remotely aware of your affects ? of course i don’t expect any real or considered answer here, you lack the humility for honest self-examination based on what another observes and suggests. you have too much false pride, false ego and arrogance to accept the possibility that someone else may have a valid perspective. no i can’t expect an answer but what i can expect from you is more of the same arrogance and a condescending, dismissive response of some sort, followed by defensive aggression. you may even revert back to the ‘blame-game’ you are compelled to play, revisiting your banning from the fofblog for the ‘umpteenth’ time… but that all just goes to proves the point.



32 Elena 
And you Ton, why do you feel compelled to prove me wrong and deny the facts? Just to justify yourself? You don't need to validate me to recognize the truth but when you invalidate the truth to hurt someone you are in a process of crime. 
There's great beauty that you're unwilling to see and I can't force you to open your eyes. 
Ton: why do you feel you always have to be ‘right’ elena ?
No Ton, it is not that I feel I always have to be right but that when I am right I am not afraid to stand up for it. Why do you think everyone should bend to what is wrong like you do?
*
Posted by at
Labels:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)