Through language, we rub on each other's self! In this friction we polish our being.
The Separation between State and Religion
In time we will realize that Democracy is the entitlement of individuals to every right that was in its times alloted to kings. The right to speak and decide, to be treated with decency, to serve and be served by people in a State of “love” that is, to serve with one’s work for the development of ‘life’. To belong to the Kingdom of Human Beings without racial, national, social or academic separations. To love and be loved. To die at the service of the whole and be honored in one’s death, for one’s life and work was legitimately valued. To be graceful and grateful. To have the pride and the humility of being One with the Universe, One with every realm of Existence, One with every living and deceased soul. To treat with dignity and be treated with dignity for One is dignified together with All others and Life itself. To walk the path of compassion, not in the sorrow of guilt but in the pride of being. To take responsability for one’s mistakes and sufferings and stand up again and again like a hero and a heroine and face the struggle that is put at one’s feet and in one’s hands. Millions of people, millions and millions of people might take many generations to realize the consciousness of our humaneness but there is no other dignified path for the human being.
The “work” as I conceive it is psychological and political. Psychology is the connection between the different dimensions within one’s self and Politics is the actualization of that consciousness in our practical lives. Religion is the ceremony that binds the connectedness between the individual and the Universe. The separation between religion, politics and science, the arts and sports is, in the sphere of the social, the reflection of the schizophrenia within the individual and the masses. The dialogue between individuality and the "human" belongs to consciousness. The tendency to develop cults resides in the shortcomings we’are finding in life as it is structured today. “Life” has become the private property of a few priviledged who cannot profit from it because as soon as it is appropriated it stops to be “life” or “life-giving”.
We are all the victims of our own invention and each one is called upon to find solutions. The only problem is believing our selves incapable of finding them. We are now free to use all Systems of knowledge objectively, sharing them without imposing our will on each other. To become objective about our lives means to understand that the institutions that govern its experience are critically important. That we are one with the governments, one with the religious activities that mark its pace, that the arena’s in which we move our bodies and the laboratories in which we explore our possibilities are ALL part and parcel of our own personal responsibility. That WE ARE ONE WITH EACH OTHER AND EVERYTHING AROUND US and acknowledge for ourselves a bond of love in conscious responsibility. That we human beings know ourselves part of each other and are willing and able to act on our behalf for the benefit of each and every individual. That we no longer allow governments, industries, universities or any other institution to run along unchecked by the objective principles of humaneness. That we do not allow gurus to abuse their power or governors to steal the taxes and use them to their personal advantage in detriment of the whole. That we do not allow abuse from anyone anywhere because life is too beautiful to do so and that we are willing to stop the rampant crime with the necessary compassion Conscious knowledge is every individual's right. Conscious action is every individual's duty.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(536)
-
▼
April
(107)
- Discourse- Foucault
- Indian Music
- FREEEEEEDOM!!! Freedom for life!
- Foucault: international citizenship
- We are the ones we've waited for! Arthur
- I just found the paper I was looking for by Mason....
- Haptic Medicine
- "We are One" - Poem by Sa'di
- America?
- Arthur's question
- Power of Love
- Humans!!! Dialogues!!! WOW!
- Refining understanding- love and power as objectiv...
- Separating From Violent Male Partners By Vivienne ...
- Addendum to Spinoza’s final text.
- people as both socially constructed and as having ...
- Celebrating understanding!
- Power over life!
- The logos- in ref. to Spinoza
- Love for thee and thee
- Elena - Spinoza
- Deleuze 2
- Elena on Deleuze
- Gilles Deleuze- semi, semi, biography!
- Grant!
- Back!
- Have a lovely weekend!
- Afghanistan: Another massacre as a bloody summer l...
- At last humans in sight! Bravo!
- Studies reveal Americans’ declining living standar...
- Josh Stieber and Ethan McCord. Thank you
- 2010 at fofblog, great post! looking beyond the no...
- Ton and Elena- Kaput!
- We are One Ton, we are still One!
- There is only one problem: inhumanity
- The connectedness of things-We are One
- We are One! And many people know it!
- Self respect is lost in those who exercise power o...
- Ton and Elena in the labyrinth!
- Dignity-Life!
- Dangerous distortions in language- manipulation
- Creative Dialogue- Inner and outer practice
- Paul Freire and freedom of speech
- (Culture in Prison- E) Notes by Steiner on democracy
- Dialogue as social and individual healer
- Dialogue - Wikipedia information
- Us and music! Ton-Elena
- Ton-Elena in a descending dialogue
- Elena- ascending dialogue
- Ton on dignity
- Dignity- Caroline of the Prince
- Elena- Property
- Ton- Chief Seattle
- We are One!
- The Personal Side of Apocalyptic Cults: A sociolog...
- Vices in Speech and Structures of Symposiums- Ton ...
- The Personal Side of Apocalyptic Cults:A sociologi...
- The Corporate Cult
- Elena-(Chomsky)
- Ton
- Elena
- Ton
- Ton and Elena 10-14
- Ton and Elena 1-9
- On religion and politics- Chomsky
- Christian Church and Israel- Chomsky
- Religion and education
- Wow! Exactly as in cults! Chomsky
- Why cults are necessary
- The Age of the Logos
- Analysis of Conversation 1 Attitude and Meaning in...
- We're at http://bbattleswordd.wordpress.com/2010/0...
- Elena's flabbergasted reply!
- Ton's incredible apology!
- Third post that was ignored but not quite!
- My second post- equally ignored
- My first post that was thoroughly ignored
- Complete analysis of discussion-Ton & Elena
- Until nothing remains- On Scientology
- Lessons to be learnt from blog-discussions
- Ton and Elena conflict in the Public Square post 1...
- On the FOF Cult and Blog
- Record of page 91 when I was banned again, april 2010
- Beautiful article about Gilles Deleuze from techgn...
- On suicide, homicide and cults- Elena
- Humanism
- Howard Zinn- Young people's Hist of America
- I honor the deaths of all cult members.
- Discovering the Sacrifice in Cult members
- In Search of Thee
- One Poem
- Dragon and the demonic
- The self and capitalism
- Elena: Life is love! The octave of impressions!
- A Roundtable Discussion on the Legacies of Michel ...
- Elena on suicide and "milieu" and internationally ...
- Foucault: VERY IMPORTANT and relevant to what happ...
- Foucault: Power through dress code
- Foucault: the Order of Things: An Archaeology of t...
- Social conditioning of inner conditioning - Elias
-
▼
April
(107)
Tuesday, 13 April 2010
Christian Church and Israel- Chomsky
Do I believe in God? Can't answer, I'm afraid. I'm not being flippant, but I don't understand the question. What is it that I am supposed to believe or not believe in? Are you asking whether I believe there is something not in the universe (or the universes, if there are (maybe infinitely) many of them), and that somehow stands above them? I've never heard of any reason for believing that. Something else? What? There are many concepts of spirituality, among them, various notions of divinity developed in the Judaeo-Christian-Islamic religions. Within these the concepts vary greatly. St. Augustine and others, for example, argued that one should not take seriously the Biblical account of God as an exaggerated human, and other Biblical accounts, because they were crafted so as to make the intended message intelligible to humans -- and on such grounds, he argued, organized religion ought to accept persuasive conclusions of science, a conception that Galileo appealed to (in vain) when he faced Papal censure.
Anyway, without clarification of a kind I have never seen, I don't know whether I believe or don't believe in whatever a questioner has in mind.
I don't see how one can "believe in organized religion." What does it mean to believe in an organization? One can join it, support it, oppose it, accept its doctrines or reject them. There are many kinds of organized religion. People associate themselves with some of them, or not, for all sorts of reasons, maybe belief in some of their doctrines.
Who wrote the Bible? Current scholarship, to my knowledge, assumes that the material that constitutes the Old Testament was put together from various oral and folk traditions (many of them going far back) in the Hellenistic period. That was one of several currents, of which the collection that formed the New Testament was another. Biblical archaeology was developed early in this century in an effort to substantiate the authenticity of the Biblical account. It's by now generally recognized in Biblical scholarship that it has done the opposite. The Bible is not a historical text, and has only vague resemblances to what took place, as far as can be reconstructed. For example, whether Israel ever existed is not clear; if so, it was probably a small kingdom somewhere in the hills, apparently virtually unknown to the Egyptians. That's my understanding, from casual reading; I haven't followed recent work closely.
Importance, relevance, historical-social impact? These are enormous questions. I can't try to address them at this level of generality; it requires at least an article, better a book or many books.
Elements of the Christian fundamentalist right are one of the strongest components of "support for Israel" -- support in an odd sense, because they presumably want to see it destroyed in a cosmic battle at Armageddon, after which all the proper souls will ascend to heaven -- or so I understand, again, not from close reading. They have provided enormous economic aid, again of a dubious sort. One of their goals seems to be to rebuild the Temple, which means destroying the Al-Aqsa Mosque, which presumably means war with the Arab world -- one of the goals, perhaps, in fulfilling the prophecy of Armageddon. So they strongly support Israeli power and expansionism, and help fund it and lobby for it; but they also support actions that are very harmful and objectionable to most of its population -- as do Jewish fundamentalist groups, mostly rooted in the US, which, after all, is one of the most extreme religious fundamentalist societies in the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment